• csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Considering that the two projects funded by Cloudflare are headed by known bigots (Andreas Kling and DHH), it makes me distrust Cloudflare even further.

    • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      i give them the benefit of the doubt, as stated on their website:

      All sponsorships are in the form of unrestricted donations. Board seats and other forms of influence are not for sale.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Is there evidence or something to support your assertion that Cloudflare = NSA?

          Even if Cloudflare = NSA, there no evidence to support your parallel. If the Ladybird team does something suspicious or hostile to the interests of its users - please let us know.

          • thelittleerik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Edward fucking Snowden and the Patriot Act.

            Cloudflare is not authorized to disclose that they are.

            They decrypt all traffic going through them for deep packet analysis. It would be dumb of the US not to make use of that. Look at Palantir. Or the recent Azure fiasco with the Unit 8200.

            • Michael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              It is naive to trust any US-based service. The devil’s advocate in me just wanted to hear why you believe what you do, so thanks for that.

              My angle was mostly to point out that Ladybird hasn’t done anything obviously morally bankrupt like the politicians you pointed out - the only detracting factors to me about the project are 1) that the nonprofit is based in the US 2) that it’s not written in Rust.

              Of course, it’s worth being suspicious of a web browser of all things. I just see Cloudflare’s contribution in a neutral light given Cloudflare’s general strategy towards PR and the fact that the Ladybird browser is likely going to be a very niche product - and they aren’t even focusing on Windows support for the foreseeable future.

              Do I trust Ladybird more than Mozilla? Only very slightly, but the bar is pretty low - and it’s not blind trust.

  • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    As the top comment on the Hacker News thread notes,

    Cloudflare clearly wants to move us to a future where only approved browsers are allowed to access the web… an independent open source web browser is obviously against that ethos.

    I’m suspicious on that basis alone.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Giving how apple adjacent the project is I have never had much faith in it being able to truly become an alternative to firefox.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        You go to the website and the images promoting the browser are using apple. The project is being developed only for macOS and linux. They decided to change the programming language to swift.

        To many signs that the devs are appleheads and I get the feeling that the main target is apple, linux second and windows completely out of the box (states by devs themselves). Myself personally, not a fan on apple, I don’t have that kind of money to buy hardware and I don’t see any advantages on doing so.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    When it incorporates something like TreeStyleTab, I’ll look into it, horizontal tab bars are just silly - most have widescreen displays and content is usually in narrow columns.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      windows browsers are all niche when you introduce anything to the mobile market. An android / iOS ladybird browser would crush it

    • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      As far as I know, there still aren’t any non-WebKit engines for iOS, even though the possibility is theoretically there as of 17.4… (It may need to be EU-only? I’m not clear on that part.)

  • Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good for them. I like to keep the free and open browser that works, free and running… So I donate a little to Firefox and Thunderbird, every so often.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        8 days ago

        Its sponsorship only of an open source browser, with no telemetry, advertising, crypto, etc, etc built in.

        Sponsors get listed as sponsors, thats it.

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 days ago

            So when they do just fork it?

            I likely won’t touch it anyway, but it is fully open source, so it can be forked easily. With the transition to Swift I suspect there would be plenty of devs who could take things forward if they wanted to.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 days ago

              If you look at history, Google did the opposite with Chrome, they forked an open source browser and turned it into the world’s most used.
              I guess we’ll see.

              • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 days ago

                Thats google though, with the added ability to put it direct into an extremely common OS (Android). With ladybird, you’ve got an apparent neocon and 3 years currently planned for a GA release (2028). Its future is already pretty uncertain regardless of sponsorship.

              • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 days ago

                Iridium, cromite, edge, brave, thorium, vivaldi, pale moon…

                And this is a drastically simpler browser that would be in swift 6.

                • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  and what can they do against the manifest v3 migration? they cannot afford to keep maintaining the code for mv2 addons. it is an important topic for efficient content blocking.

                  its funny you bring up edge as an alternative. brave too has opt-out telemetry and other shenanigans.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Cloudflare has announced its sponsorship of the Ladybird browser, an independent (still-in-development) open-source initiative

    Is it still independent?

    • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes, and their donations are limited to 100k a year per corporation/organization, so there cant be a company who comes, donates 20million and then tries to gain control of them through money

      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, and their donations are limited to 100k a year per corporation/organization

        Interesting that they did that.

        • joshchandra@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Frankly, that’s really cool and I think all NPOs capable of doing that should follow suit… though I suppose that paves the way towards ghost or shell companies sneaking in that way… Hmm…

    • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes, it is still independent. Cloudflare is just one of the three Platinum sponsors. Other two are Shopify and FUTO. Proton is also a sponsor, but in Gold tier, iirc.

        • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 days ago

          Andreas (lead engineer) has told the story of how he got that money - they just happen to know each other and $100k is peanuts for the Shopify founders.

          But you’re right to suspect anything of the sort!

    • Sina@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think It’s on their charter that no matter how much corporate money they’ll get they’ll never accept any outside influence just the same. The donators are amply warned to not expect anything other than development as usual or faster.

      • Mniot@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        People always imagine this as “I will pay you $100 to kick the puppy” and of course they would never.

        But what actually happens is that you have a long-term donor. You rely on their help (they’re paying for you to be able to hire a nice college intern who’s really smart and has been fun to have on the project). They never tell you what to do so you see them as more of a friend than anything else. It’s perfectly normal to get some lunch with friends and talk. You’re stuck on some problems and they have some good connections that help you out. That might even be worth more than $100k, but it’s not money at all so it’s OK that they’re helping you like this. They also talk you up, which is like free advertising except you didn’t ask for it so that also doesn’t count. Anyway, at some of the lunches they’re telling you about what’s going on with them and there’s some problems they’re dealing with that you could help with. They don’t ask for help, of course, because they know you’re independent. But being independent means it’s OK for you to do what you want. Even help a friend out who didn’t ask for help so they’re not influencing you…

    • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      they stated on their website this project will remain independet and that donators don´t have a say in how this is being developed

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      No browser with third party investors can be really independent, they always will obey more the interests of the investors as on those from the users. Anyway the guys from Ladybird have balls of steel to develope an browser engine from scratch in an market saturated of browsers of any kind and a brutal competition, this would had more sense 15 years ago, but not now. Good luck, maybe in 2029-2030 there is an good browser multi-platform with all the needed infrastructure, servers and extensions, but I’ll see to believe.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        How can you say it’s saturated when chrome has an effective monopoly. If you look at browser engines, there’s basically only 3 for desktop, with one of them targeting only Macs.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          As said, there are currently three engines + two forks of these (Gonanna and Qt), except some basic render engines from text only browsers (Links, Lynx and some others), but over hundred different browsers which use these engines, + almost 70 abandoned ones, because outdated engines and others which also tried to develope an own engine. This is what I mean with saturated. It’s nice to try to release a browser with a new independent engine, but if there are not enough users which also use it, it’s a death born child. For some products the market is limited. Make it eg. sense to release a new OS? There also existing only 4, Unix, Unixbased like Windows or Mac and Linux with tons of distros. It’s not only the browser engine, in over 20 years there are also growed complete infrastructure arround these engines, dedicated plug ins, extensions, etc, which don’t exist for a new indie engine, precisely because other browsers, which also tried to release a new engine, before Ladybird, are currently all death. Sad, but you need also a minimum of infrastructure for an browser and which offer also somewhat more as only a new engine. It need security and privacy measures, inbuild or with extensions/plug-ins which need an extra developement and other things more.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        No browser with third party investors can be really independent, they always will obey more the interests of the investors as on those from the users.

        That’s why they limited donations to $100k per organization. No one is allowed to make themselves indispensable to the project.