• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The original statement was:

        If the CIA helped that’s fine, people like that should not be in power.

        I took issue with that stance. It doesn’t matter whether or not Euromaidan was a coup to do that.

        Condoning CIA coups if “the people” wanted it basically gives the CIA carte blanche to coup whoever they want, as long as they manufacture consent enough.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You talked about a coup by the CIA. They’re talking about CIA helping. Two different things. Like you said, we don’t know the extent of their involvement

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            So it’s also ok to condone the FBI murdering people if we don’t know that the FBI killed MLK?

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                They said that it would have been ok if they helped. That conditional statement doesn’t depend on whether or not they did intervene.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Why don’t yousee the connection. Both are instances of covert violence by the US. One is a foreign affair, the other domnestic.