• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I just don’t think it counts as covert violence you mentioned earlier if CIA isn’t party to or in some degree involved in the violence

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But we’re talking hypotheticals here. Of course it’s not violence if it didn’t occur.

      Let’s say I say the statement: “It’s ok if I kick puppies!” Is that stance ok to have, if I’ve never kicked a puppy?

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        But they weren’t explicitly condoning violence as you are doing in your example. So again it’s not the same

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            They’re condoning helping to oust Yanukovych. If that counts as imperialism then yes they seem to be condoning at least that specific action, though we don’t know the extent of the help they’re condoning. But you were talking about covert violence, I don’t think they said anything about that

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Imperialism includes covert violence.

              Do you think the Euromaidan was completely violence free? Ukrainian military has bombed eastern Ukraine for years after Euromaidan.

              • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                We don’t know if CIA was involved or party to any of that violence though. That’s why condoning CIA help doesn’t mean they’re immediately condoning covert murders or kicking puppies (hah) or other things you compared it to.

                If you want to know what they are specifically condoning, you could try to achieve that by asking them. Now we’re just talking about what they could have meant.

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It’s still imperialism. I’ve stated that they condone imperialism. Nothing more (kicking puppies), nothing less (political violence).