Gaza isn’t the world. And please don’t think I mean anything more than the literal meaning of the words. I’m 100% on the side of the Palestinian people and against Israel and everything they’ve done in relation to this.
Just pointing out that your comment doesn’t really make sense. He could have done nothing to the US and still have been a valid choice for the above mentioned definition of time’s person of the year.
While I understand that Gaza should not be a single-issue topic, the choice of headlines position this Time article very much around the Israel/Palestine topic.
Gaza isn’t the world. And please don’t think I mean anything more than the literal meaning of the words. I’m 100% on the side of the Palestinian people and against Israel and everything they’ve done in relation to this. Just pointing out that your comment doesn’t really make sense. He could have done nothing to the US and still have been a valid choice for the above mentioned definition of time’s person of the year.
While I understand that Gaza should not be a single-issue topic, the choice of headlines position this Time article very much around the Israel/Palestine topic.