• hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m 100% sure they think Homelander represents out of control leftists.

        • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          He blows up a plane in like the first ever episode or something. They make it VERY obvious he is the bad guy from the start. It’s impossible not to understand that and yet

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            I started rewatching it recently (I haven’t seen the newer seasons). There is an argument that that plane was an accident. He lasered the hijacker and destroyed the controls. At minimum, it’s incredibly careless though, and he’s still at fault for it and for not really giving a shit about the people on the plane. It’s possible it’s on purpose, but they don’t make it explicit that he’s evil then. Only that he’s selfish.

            The plane with the senator though? Yeah, he did that on his own on purpose.

            • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              YOU SHOULD also watch GEn V, which is the in-between seasons of boyz. in the plane incident, one indian lady said her family was killed, and she tried to take vengeance on all Vs and homelander by releasing a virus.

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      no, they would think homlander is good and trying to stop out of control leftists.

      your claimed 100% certainty is hyperbolic and outright laughable

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well when the education system of the US essentially teaches:

      • Nazi bad because they hated Jews. That’s it. Don’t look at why they chose Jews as a target to scapegoat societies material problems. Don’t look at how closely connected fascism is to the interests of capital. And definitely equate them with socialism because they had that word in their name. Ignore the fact they put Marxist in concentration camps first.

      And then teach:

      • Stalin bad because he was a “authoritarian” and purposely starved his people while eating all the wheat with a big spoon. This is all that socialism ever is. It’s just when one guy has all the power. Don’t look up what “Soviets” actually were. Definitely don’t teach about the country that was most responsible for stopping and defeating the Nazis. It was all just our big bomb we dropped on a completely different country that was entirely needed and not an unnecessary show of force to the USSR.

      Its easy to manipulate “educated” people to working against their own interests.

      • Jikiya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I would argue that the USSR is only the most responsible when looking at it through the loss of human life. It seems likely they would have never made it to Berlin without lend-lease. No one knows if the Germans could have regrouped and done better without the aid to the USSR, maybe the same number would have died, just in different locations. But, most of the USSR’s ability to move material around was due to the allies supplying them with logistics vehicles, both trucks, and railroads/engines/RR cars.