Does DJT know Vance is running against him in 2028
Until DJT goes full Putin, this is his last term
She had her husband killed because he wouldn’t back JD and Vance. Many people are saying it.
Quiet piggy! Also didn’t her dead husband believe she should shut up and go to the kitchen.
He will never, ever make her cum.
Of course not! She’s not a couch.
You win the internet today.
Thank you for your service
Money and power makes her cum
The system is so broken
Let’s keep funding it though and keep spending on all of our wants that we don’t need. That way things will get worse!
How do we fix a cancer-ridden machine that we are all very much a party to?
So she’s fucking him?
She’s probably been banging the immigrant pool boy for years behind Charlie’s back, Vance isnt gonna cut it
I heard she was sucking and fucking. And I heard she has a tattoo above The V that says “Nut Depository”.
Degrading women is cool when it’s people you don’t like
lol they think they’re gonna follow up Trump with Vance?
Haha, I’m not sure they’ll follow up Trump with Vance, but it’s definitely an interesting choice!
I’m honestly surprised America doesn’t have those suicide bomber we used to hear so much about after 911.
This is only because he thinks President’s Day is the best day for couch sales.
Man, when JD leaves Usha for Erika, the fireworks will be amazing to watch.
He’ll just get ICE Shanghai her…oopsie.
She’s gonna support him in every way she can, in and out of the bedroom.
Vance is an absolute dud of a candidate but I’m sure the Democrats will manage to come up with someone even more ludicrously unsuited.
They will invent one. In a lab.
DNC torn between HRC, Newsom, and Schumer
What about Sinema? She’s super qualified.
Not Liz Cheney?
Oh, of course! Those primaries will be lit!
Harris / Hegseth 2028
Buttigieg / Bessent
By unsuited, do you mean for the job or to get the vote of fickle progressives?
Making their constituents feel represented is a huge part of their job
“Dem candidates are never bad, progressives are just fickle!” - you
“The party cannot fail, it can only be failed.”
- every moderate fuckwad stuck in 1992
They’re not worse than JD Vance, which was the contention. If the commenter is not coming at it from the disgruntled progressive stance, as so many here are, then that part of my response was off the mark.
The commenter is being very coy about what was meant.
You don’t even know who it’s gonna be and you’re already stating they’ll be better than Vance as if it’s a truism. I can absolutely see the DNC fucking up so badly that Vance looks like a better alternative. INB4 we end up with two Peter Thiel acolytes running against each other; “abundance” vs. “Christian” nationalism, a true clash of ideas.
You don’t even know who it’s gonna be and you’re already stating they’ll be better than Vance as if it’s a truism.
This thread has gotten quite derailed. The original commenter made the supposition that the nominee will be even more ludicrously unsuited than Vance. I take issue with that assumption. Like you said, we don’t even know who the nominee is.
I’m saying that historically the Dem candidates have not been ludicrously unsuited compared to their opponents. If that’s the case, where’s this thought that the next one will be coming from?
I think we’re on different wavelengths because I’m coming at this from the position that there’s a distinction to be made between who is the better candidate and who is better for the country. Trump, despite being a fascist moron who has and continues to destroy the lives of millions while enriching himself and his donors, was a better candidate than Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. Any of those three would have been better for the country (marginally) but were absolutely god-awful candidates. The only reason Biden even won by a hair is because of how awful Trump’s first term was, that people were willing to hold their nose and vote for Biden despite hating his guts.
What job exactly would that be? To do the bidding of the oligarchs or to actually represent the electorate?
I’m asking what you mean, so feel free to add details. Let’s just use Kamala Harris as an example.
Who would be better suited to do the bidding of the oligarchs? Trump or Harris.
Who would be better suited to actually represent the electorate? Trump or Harris.
Who would be better suited to get the vote of fickle progressives? Trump or Harris.
Your answers will help me determine what your comment meant. Let me know if you were thinking of someone other than Harris who that was and if your answers would be any different.
Wait, what? Trump is running for the Democrats now?
I was reading into your original comment that you thought in the past Democrats have put forth candidates that are “even more ludicrously unsuited” than their Republican opponents. I assumed, regrettably, that you were basing your remark on historical evidence.
You can clear this up pretty quickly by just explaining what you meant. Here’s your comment:
Vance is an absolute dud of a candidate but I’m sure the Democrats will manage to come up with someone even more ludicrously unsuited.
Why do you think that? Did you find Harris more unsuited than Trump? If so, for what? If not, what do you mean?
Did you find Harris more unsuited than Trump?
She lost. If the topic is “unsuited as a candidate”, we have our answer.
That could be an answer. Unsuited to win. But that’s a little hard to judge ahead of time.
Sofa king stupid
why the hat?
This was an AI clip Colbert made to make fun of JD Vance when JD Vance was trying to say that putting Hakeem Jeffries in an AI video with a sombrero wasn’t racist. The sombrero here is a callback to that original video.
It’s taco Tuesday my friend
JD Vance divorce/Remarriage incoming
I wonder who the bride will be
