nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 个月前"Being vegan is unnatural"discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square849linkfedilinkarrow-up1996arrow-down199file-text
arrow-up1897arrow-down1image"Being vegan is unnatural"discuss.tchncs.denutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 个月前message-square849linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-square_tasten_tiger@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up105arrow-down9·2 个月前If the recipient asked for it and the donor is giving it out of free will with the explicit intention then yes it is a medical treatment.
minus-squareryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up74arrow-down47·2 个月前Ah yes so when I give my dog antibiotics for an infection against his will it’s definitely not medical treatment
minus-squareM137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up99arrow-down8·2 个月前Making an animal pregnant isn’t solving a medical issue. How do you not see the difference?
minus-squareBarbarian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up46arrow-down7·2 个月前Personally I view it the same as giving medicine to a baby. They don’t understand, sometimes you have to make decisions in their best interests. Key point: in their best interests, not for personal gain.
minus-squarejnod4@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down12·2 个月前Are you planning on eating said dog?
minus-squareryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 个月前If we’re gonna eat it then same goes for my chickens
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前Probably not. But if the cow doesn’t get pregnant, it will probably become dog food.
minus-squareremon@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down14·edit-22 个月前With humans yes, but in the case of non-human animals these decisions are up to the owner. edit: clarification for the ultra-dense.
minus-square_tasten_tiger@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down45·2 个月前You are aware humans are animals? The differentiation “human” is artificial and made up…
minus-squareremon@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up43arrow-down4·2 个月前non-human animals … I didn’t think it needed spelling out.
minus-squareArcadeep@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 个月前 The differentiation “human” is artificial and made up… Uh… So the differentiation between ‘cow’ and ‘chicken’ is also artificial and made up, as well as the differentiation between ‘rock’ and ‘jetplane.’ What’s your point?
minus-squarestickly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·2 个月前 The differentiation “human” is artificial and made up… You share 25% of your DNA with a tree, is it slavery to own four apple trees?
minus-squaresnowdriftissue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·2 个月前 If the recipient asked for it and the donor is giving it out of free will …and it’s medically indicated
If the recipient asked for it and the donor is giving it out of free will with the explicit intention then yes it is a medical treatment.
Ah yes so when I give my dog antibiotics for an infection against his will it’s definitely not medical treatment
Making an animal pregnant isn’t solving a medical issue. How do you not see the difference?
Personally I view it the same as giving medicine to a baby. They don’t understand, sometimes you have to make decisions in their best interests.
Key point: in their best interests, not for personal gain.
Are you planning on eating said dog?
Yes.
If we’re gonna eat it then same goes for my chickens
Probably not. But if the cow doesn’t get pregnant, it will probably become dog food.
With humans yes, but in the case of non-human animals these decisions are up to the owner.
edit: clarification for the ultra-dense.
You are aware humans are animals? The differentiation “human” is artificial and made up…
non-human animals … I didn’t think it needed spelling out.
Uh… So the differentiation between ‘cow’ and ‘chicken’ is also artificial and made up, as well as the differentiation between ‘rock’ and ‘jetplane.’
What’s your point?
You share 25% of your DNA with a tree, is it slavery to own four apple trees?
…and it’s medically indicated