• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      The US could just leave and let them do that. The strait isn’t even US territory

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yes, and the US could just ignore that. It didn’t stop them from starting the war in the first place, after all.

          • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            16 days ago

            Dementia Don didn’t think about the strait when he attacked and fired anybody in his admin that would have been against it.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yes, you may see an economic downturn. Losing a war generally doesn’t result in sunshine and rainbows.

        • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          The US is a net exporter of oil. If we put price and export controls on domestic oil we could let them keep the strait closed and not suffer any increase in gas prices.

          It’s just that export and price controls cut into the profits of the oil corporations, who have been making bank off this and are the real winners of this whole thing, and trump would never let that happen.

          • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            The majority of US refinery capacity is designed to process the heavy crude we import from elsewhere, the light crude we extract domestically is newer industry that doesn’t have equivalent refinery capacity, that’s why we export it and why we’re a net exporter overall. Our extraction and refinery mismatch is why your plan wouldn’t work. We would instead burn quickly through the < 4 months of national oil reserves we have left.

            • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              Is there much heavy crude coming out of the strait? I always thought gulf oil was pretty light and the heavy shit mostly came from Venezuela and Canada who would be uneffected by the strait being close.

              • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                It is, and most of it goes to Asia, but since oil demand is just barely met all over the world a supply shortage anywhere is felt everywhere through rippling demand. But I was just explaining why a closed-door domestic oil policy wouldn’t work in the USA despite our net export. Under any foreseeable global demand regime.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        No, they couldn’t do that, because the US economy would be in even more shambles. You are seriously misunderstanding the situation here, or is it just US copism?

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Dunno, sounds like Americas problem. They started a war they can’t win.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        Since this is a war of aggression on the part of the US, the US could just walk away from it.

        Which contradicts this.