• HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’ve clearly never lived with a cat. Your metaphor is crushed by the Kitty Expansion Theory: No piece of furniture is large enough for a cat and any other additional being.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        horrible take IMO. firefox is using 12GB for me right now, but you have no idea how many or what kind of tabs either of us have, which makes all the difference to the point your comment has no value whatsoever.

        • puppy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          How come it has no value? I used to run Chrome but now I run Firefox. My browsing habits have not changed yet the memory consumption has greatly improved. It may not have any value to you but it certainly was a valuable experience for me and I made the comment hoping that it might find someone who is in the same situation as I was. I’ve got nothing to prove and nothing to gain. Anyone may run their own experiment.

  • Ravenson@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    As somebody with a System76 laptop, I’m feeling personally attacked.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My 2010 arm board with 256MB ram running openmediavault and minidlna for music streaming. Still lots of RAM left.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Just like the human eye can only register 60fps and no more, your computer can only register 4gb of RAM and no more. Anything more than that is just marketing.

    Fucking /S since you clowns can’t tell.

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Jokes on you, because i looked into this once. I don’t know the exact ms the light-sensitive rods in human eyes need to refresh the chemical anymore but it resulted in about 70 fps, so about 13 ms i guess (the color-sensitive cones are far slower). But psycho-optical effects can drive that number up to 100 fps in LCD displays. Though it looks like you can train yourself with certain computer tasks to follow movements with your eye, being far more sensible to flickering.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not about training, eye tracking is just that much more sensitive to pixels jumping

        You can immediately see choppy movement when you look around in a 1st person view game. Or if it’s an RTS you can see the trail behind your mouse anyway

        I can see this choppiness at 280 FPS. The only way to get rid of it is to turn on strobing, but that comes with double images at certain parts of the screen

        Just give me a 480 FPS OLED with black frame insertion already, FFS

        • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, i do not follow movements (jump to the target) with my eyes and see no difference between 30 and 60 FPS, run comfortably Ark Survival on my iGPU at 20 FPS. And i’m still pretty good in shooters.

          Yeah, it’s bad that our current tech stack doesn’t allow to just change image where change happens.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s not sarcasm, it’s misinformation. Not surprising that people downvoted you even though it was just a joke.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Now snap some pics of this kitty laying in different places all over this couch; you now have a new meme: Address Space Layout Randomization.

    • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I genuinely don’t know how people are having their web browser use so much ram. How many tabs do you have open? Even at work where I run a commercial loan origination system and our core customer system in a web browser, at most I’ll have 15-20 tabs open. I don’t know how people are having dozens and dozens of tabs open that they’re using 64 gb of RAM.

  • bitwaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I remember building my gaming machine in 2008 and put 4GB (2x2) in, then RAM prices tanked 6 months later so I added another 4GB. I remember having lots of conversations where I was like “yeah, 8GB is over kill” but what I didn’t expect is that it was such overkill that when I built my next machine in 2012, I still only put 8GB on it.

    It wasn’t until 2019 that I built a machine and put 16GB in it. I ran on 8GB for over a decade. Pretty impressive for gaming.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Am I the only one around here that maxes out their RAM to the max that the board will take? Sure 128 Gig is overkill now, but the 32 Gig I installed in my last laptop was supposed to be overkill just 3 years ago. I did manage to use my previous laptop for a whole 12 years with only 16 Gig.

      • unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have no problems currently on my personal computer with 16GB. If RAM is ever an issue, you can always upgrade (especially if you leave slots empty). Plus RAM generally has a tendency to get cheaper over time, so why waste money now?