• DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    That’s not the worst idea ever. Say a screenshot is 10 mb. 10x60x 8 hours =4800mb per work day. 30 days is 150gb worst case scenario. I suppose you could check the previous screenshot and if it’s the same, then don’t write a new file. Combine that with OCR and a utility to scroll forward and backward through time, it might be a useful tool.

    • RandomLegend [He/Him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you on 16k resolution or something?

      When i take a screenshot of my 3440x1440 display it’s 1MB big. I mean this doesn’t change the issue in its core but dramatically downsizes it

      • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Once a minute, and only if the screen contents change. I imagine there’s something lightweight enough.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          In order to be certified for running Recall, machines currently must have an NPU (Neural Processing Unit, basically an AI coprocessor). I assume that is what makes it practical to do by offloading the required computation from the CPU.

          Apparently it IS possible to circumvent that requirement using a hack, which is what some of the researchers reporting on it have done, but I haven’t read any reports on how that affects CPU usage in practice.

          • wick@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Recall analyses each screenshot and uses AI or whatever to add tags to it. I’d assume that’s what the NPU is used for.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s what recall is… It’s literally screenshotring and. Ocr / ai parsing Combined with a sqllite database

      • Cargon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If only MS used DuckDB then they wouldn’t have such a huge PR disaster on their hands.

  • widw@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Am I the only one who honestly thinks Recall is totally useless? I feel like everyone is acting like it’s useful and the only thing to debate over is whether it’s “worth the security risk”. But I feel like it’s not even worth anything at all. Even if there was no risk and I was 100% in control I don’t think I would ever use such a feature.

    Wouldn’t you waste just as much (if not more) time looking through old screenshots, than to just go look up a solution the old fashioned way? Whatever you were looking at is probably still in your browser history too.

    I know the point is it has some AI crap with it, but that still requires you to remember enough information about what you’re looking for to filter them. And if you know that much information I think you could probably just find whatever you were looking for again normally.

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s because you know how to find information in a computer quickly and precisely. Recalk is for clueless people. They can ask the computer in plain English.