Don’t dehumanize him. He’s a human just like you and me, and we must stay vigilant to our friends and our selves to not become like Andrew Tate or any other people who have terrible unchecked thoughts and actions.
I’m well aware of my actions. Just like it is. Have you seen the video of it smacking a woman with a belt because she upset it? I’m not joking. The video exists. This is not consensual
Because, and this might be my own perceptions, terms like “they” or “them” for non-binary is for acknowledging humans. To me, that’s the least way I can acknowledge their existence. As a fellow human being (if I knew their name, that would probably be easier). But you use words like “it” for insects, or worms, or spiders, or a pile of trash, or pre or post morning coffee dump. Let me tell you, they’re both surprisingly consistent piles of shit
Well I know plenty of enbies and/or objectkin who use it/its pronouns and I don’t agree with you using their pronouns to insult a conservative. As a gay otherkin enby who’s attracted to gay otherkin enbies, the pronoun set it/its applied to a sapient being turns on the part of my brain that looks for attractive people. So I feel as though you’re trying to convince me that Tate is a viable sexual partner. Or at least, of a gender identity I could potentially be attracted to. While using he/him others him as a privileged male, and makes it easier to view him as an asshole leveraging social inequality for personal gain.
I don’t mean any offense, but those words were around before the inception of non-binary lifestyles. You don’t get to claim them as exclusive use. I will continue referring to Tate as it.
That’s ridiculous. They only started dropping the H from “hit” to create the word “it” during the middle ages. But nonbinary people have been around for 300,000 years. That means enbies are over 300 times as old as it/its pronouns. Why are you telling lies?
My point is you don’t have exclusive right to words and their use. You assumed I was using as an offensive comparison tool when I already expressed I wasn’t. Again, I don’t mean any offense, but for you to support non-binary lifestyles, you seem to think very binary
Hey don’t be mean to my boy swamp thing he’s actually very kind once you get to know him and his politics are actually very progressive - nothing like andrew Tate at all tbh
I didn’t see their comment, but look at their history, they must have 100 (no exaggeration) comments deleted by mod in the last two hours. Pretty weird.
It’s cool. I got it, and please understand this is quote (At no point is this my opinion, nor do I support the ideology. This is strictly a quote). They said “You can’t be racist towards jews because they aren’t human”
You can’t be racist to Andrew Tate because he’s not a human.
Don’t dehumanize him. He’s a human just like you and me, and we must stay vigilant to our friends and our selves to not become like Andrew Tate or any other people who have terrible unchecked thoughts and actions.
Somehow I agree with you both
“Yes, the high road is obviously better, however”
I’m well aware of my actions. Just like it is. Have you seen the video of it smacking a woman with a belt because she upset it? I’m not joking. The video exists. This is not consensual
https://youtube.com/shorts/9DMpTXhEiIg?si=e5R7s55YbaNBAfJT
I do not doubt or counter the terrible things he has done and continues to do.
He is a despicable person.
He’s not a person. He’s less than
Why are you calling a sexist pig by pronouns that make him sound like a nonbinary QT?
Because, and this might be my own perceptions, terms like “they” or “them” for non-binary is for acknowledging humans. To me, that’s the least way I can acknowledge their existence. As a fellow human being (if I knew their name, that would probably be easier). But you use words like “it” for insects, or worms, or spiders, or a pile of trash, or pre or post morning coffee dump. Let me tell you, they’re both surprisingly consistent piles of shit
Well I know plenty of enbies and/or objectkin who use it/its pronouns and I don’t agree with you using their pronouns to insult a conservative. As a gay otherkin enby who’s attracted to gay otherkin enbies, the pronoun set it/its applied to a sapient being turns on the part of my brain that looks for attractive people. So I feel as though you’re trying to convince me that Tate is a viable sexual partner. Or at least, of a gender identity I could potentially be attracted to. While using he/him others him as a privileged male, and makes it easier to view him as an asshole leveraging social inequality for personal gain.
I don’t mean any offense, but those words were around before the inception of non-binary lifestyles. You don’t get to claim them as exclusive use. I will continue referring to Tate as it.
That’s ridiculous. They only started dropping the H from “hit” to create the word “it” during the middle ages. But nonbinary people have been around for 300,000 years. That means enbies are over 300 times as old as it/its pronouns. Why are you telling lies?
My point is you don’t have exclusive right to words and their use. You assumed I was using as an offensive comparison tool when I already expressed I wasn’t. Again, I don’t mean any offense, but for you to support non-binary lifestyles, you seem to think very binary
Don’t be such a specicist! Swamp creatures born from chemical accidents should have rights too!
Hey don’t be mean to my boy swamp thing he’s actually very kind once you get to know him and his politics are actually very progressive - nothing like andrew Tate at all tbh
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
I didn’t see their comment, but look at their history, they must have 100 (no exaggeration) comments deleted by mod in the last two hours. Pretty weird.
It’s cool. I got it, and please understand this is quote (At no point is this my opinion, nor do I support the ideology. This is strictly a quote). They said “You can’t be racist towards jews because they aren’t human”