For context: I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD and I somehow need to get an app on there that only has a flatpak release

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    People bitching about Flatpaks don’t understand that they have dedupe built in. You’re literally not using any more space and it’s easier for app developers to deploy.

    Try using Snaps sometime, if you want something to actually bitch about.

  • Shayeta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    No problem, just makr sure your system has the exact version of libraries the application needs. And oh, you will only update those dependencies when the application update updates the requirements.

    Oh what’s that? Another application you want to install uses the same lib but different version? Tough luck, chump!

    Seriously it’s either flatpaks or the multi-version dependency management that openSUSE has, and you’re not saving much more space here either.

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      or statically compiling literally everything then you got 50 copies of the same thing like windows & macos!

  • krull_krull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “maybe a software being excessively bloated isn’t a good thing”

    “just buy more storage bro”

    B*tch. i live in a third world country, with limited internet and data plan, and also is still a student. If i can just buy more storage and better hardware i will.

    • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      This excuse is so dumb for many reasons. Provide me the source and I will make my own package if needed.

      The same excuse is used to make terribly performing video games… Just buy a better graphics card if you want to run <any modern game> at over 60fps!

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    So maybe use Debian and compile the app yourself instead? The Dev made something free with their time, use your time to make it work for you.

  • Gerowen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Alternatively though, if an app has KDE library dependencies for example, it’s kinda nice to not have to install a whole other desktop system wide.

  • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Another missed occasion to have taken a screenshot. There’s gnome-screenshot, scrot, your DE’s integrated tool and so many others to choose from, you can do it!

    That sort of shit makes me hate the modern internet. (Also screenshots are cleaner and therefore compress better since you seem to care (rightfully) about storage space.)

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah but if youre using a lemmy app on your phone its significantly faster to just use your phone camera rather than having to share/transfer the file over somehow, or sign into lemmy on your pc. Im not saying you’re wrong, but i get why someone wouldn’t care for a quick throwaway post. Also storage then isnt an issue on the PC at all because the image is only on the phone.

      • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Phones also have limited storage?

        Regardless, posting on the desktop is exactly as hard as typing in the name of your instance and your credentials…

        If you’re gonna be editing a meme, typing comments and such, it’s worth it very fast imo.

        And crucially, it’s a really basic form of respect for your audience. Oh and also framing the shot correctly, we’re missing part of the text…

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah but their computer is what had limited storage. Most phones these days have a lot more than 8gb. Idk like i said youre not wrong but i still got what they were trying to communicate.

  • rice@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s very efficient for what it does. and your programs will actually open.

  • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    and 8gb ssd? at that size it’s surely a removable 2242 ngff drive, it’s like 10$ for a 64gb one. you’re quite literally throttling your systems read/write speed, cause ssds want at least 20% free to manipulate files.

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      he said it’s a thin client so it is likely soldered on but almost all of them do have m.2 support. But many of them are actual sata m.2 so don’t accidentally buy a nvme m.2. easy enough to check which yours supports

  • aguasemgas@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    Português
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Flatpak only is a yikes, but I see the appeal Works with everyone, so is fools prove But a .deb is always welcome ;)

    • jmf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      flatpak only on an immutable distro with podman containers is great for the dev work I do. I get all the benefits of the AUR, .deb, and zypper while keeing my machine rock solid.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Flatpak seems to be the best choice for consistency and to have it working straight out of the box. I think Linux currently needs this because we’re getting a lot less tech-savvy Linux users nowadays. Don’t get me wrong; package managers should still be used, but how are we going to get people to change if they run into package conflicts or accidentally uninstall a wrong package?

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Until it doesn’t work. There’s a lot of subtlety, and at some point you’ll have to match what the OS provide. Even containers are not “run absolutely anywhere” but “run mostly anywhere”.

        That doesn’t change the point, of course; software that are dependent on the actual kernel/low level library to provide something will be hard to get working in unexpected situations anyway, but the “silver bullet” argument irks me.

        • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Everything is flawed, there is no silver bullet. But again, it’s still a massive improvement over what we had previously.

        • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Well, that’s the neat part. We don’t need to do that because what Flatpak does, doesn’t matter for them. People can just install Flatpak in their system and they have access to everything. I realise for system components it’s a different story, but that’s not the use case, it’s for applications.

          Edit: typo.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s useful, but it isn’t the best option for everyone, so other options should be available.

      • lastweakness@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Why would you want the app devs to make that? The whole problem with distro-specific packages is having to package for multiple formats and it’s a painstaking process that really isn’t worth any amount of time investment at all. If you’re an app developer, you’d much rather just make a universal package and hope that some distro package maintainer packages your app for their distro. That’s just basic common sense…

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Because Flatpaks can’t share libraries or anything. It creates a lot of bloat that doesn’t need to be there. It’s great for users that want to make sure the app will always work, but it isn’t great for being efficient.

          • lastweakness@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            This is just a straight up lie. Flatpaks do share libraries, both as runtimes (as seen even in the screenshot here) and through deduplication between different runtimes and runtime versions. There’s usually very little bloat, if any, especially if you use Flatpaks a lot, which you probably should, given the huge number of advantages especially with proprietary apps.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just what to install an app. I don’t want to spend an evening figgering out how to get a PWA to install. I don’t want to consult a form or your git repository to install some package I will use once and will be patched out in the next version.