That your vapid contrarianism in willful ignorance of the commenter’s thesis is yet another example of the self-righteous, performative and banal virtue signalling infecting communications in this age at every level, in every medium, from every side.
It’s feeding the philosophical and metaphysical simulacra created by techno-feudalists that provide the foundation to rule with impunity.
If “perfect is the enemy of good”, the billionaires want the slaves performing purity tests of all varieties to distract from a common goal.
You proved his point, arguing against his point.
That’s some real lack of self awareness.
What point of his did I “prove”?
That your vapid contrarianism in willful ignorance of the commenter’s thesis is yet another example of the self-righteous, performative and banal virtue signalling infecting communications in this age at every level, in every medium, from every side.
It’s feeding the philosophical and metaphysical simulacra created by techno-feudalists that provide the foundation to rule with impunity.
If “perfect is the enemy of good”, the billionaires want the slaves performing purity tests of all varieties to distract from a common goal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulverism