• pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Can someone please explain to me why centrist left leaning parties in democraciey will literally try anything other than improving the conditions of the working class?

    It’s the same here in Germany: The soc dems post cringe ass tick toks and chose the most conservative and corrupt candidate instead of doing anything important they promised prior to the election…

    Why do they choose this hill to die on? Microchips are in everything, our societies would collapse without them. Why shouldn’t the company that produces them be owned by the state?

    He stinks of shit, wears makeup like a clown and is a waddling, blabbling bag of insecurities and they shit on the one thing i can kinda get behind (though it’s just a share, no majority)? Goddam this infuriates me to no end…

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Left political parties are controlled opposition.

      The finance economy has co-invested the large pools of money from ‘The Left’ and ‘The Right’.

      This financial class has created a worldwide caste system.

      Thus financial class does not factor in quality of life for people below them while maximizing profits.

  • Leet@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    14 hours ago

    America can only dream of being socialist or communist. Such a confused place that they can’t tell the difference between fascist and socialist

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    The MAGA turd stains swing back and forth from Fascism to Communism. Fucking hypocrites.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Fascism also implies state control of the economy, so nah this is very in line with historical fascist states.

      The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State–a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values–interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.

      Fascism is definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the political and economic sphere. (p. 32)

      The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporate, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organised in their respective associations, circulate within the State. (p. 41).

      -Mussolini https://politicalresearch.org/2005/01/12/mussolini-corporate-state

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Indeed, Mussolini was the Little Austrian Corporal’s mentor. The German worker was making less than they did during the Great Depression. MAGA will do the same in the USA.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      None of them stand behind anything but money.

      I recently cut a new friend from my life, went from normal seeming dude to full trumpism, I guess I just didn’t see it before. Told him I don’t associate with trump supporters and blocked his number. He said he shouldn’t have brought up politics.

      No man, be proud of the shit you believe in, don’t hide it! You voted for hatred, stand behind it! It’s everyone else that’s wrong!

      Fuck em. Stand up for what you believe in and either receive the hatred happily or reevaluate why you’re getting shit on. Being a decent human doesn’t cost much at all.

  • azuth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does not get you control, this is just the government giving money to big corporations which is perfectly in line with actual capitalism (as.practiced, not the fairy tale version).

    Real capitalists will also have no problem with the government taking over a failing company, paying off it’s debts and later selling it at a loss to them.

    • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Government ownership over industry where they do have direct control would still be capitalism though, as long as commodity production, wage labor and markets exist, since that’s what actually defines it. Ownership alone isn’t relevant.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Technically you could still have commodity production, wage labor, and markets under other systems such as under market socialism and various forms of anarchism that use markets as an economic driver.

        • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Calling a system something else doesn’t make it different, all of these are still fundamentally capitalist. Production remains commodity-based and mediated by markets, labor power stays commodified and exploitative (if not via capitalists, then via the state apparatus or the markets), wealth accumulation remains in place leading to inevitable snowballing monopolies and wealth gaps, etc.

          Only by fundamentally changing what things are produced for and how the goods are distributed (for example, instead of for profit we produce for use to fill people’s needs) only then does the system overcome capitalism.

    • BossDj@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d really hate if it does come down to him as presidential frontrunner, but his team’s tweets have been incredible

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Same. I’m enjoying his trolling, but knowing that it’s probably only in service of improving his image in order to force a presidential run down our throats, makes me enjoy it a lot less. Newsom is just not a genuine guy, he has always given me sleazy greasy politician vibes, and his governance hasn’t made up for it.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is why democrats are still losing to trump, they can’t give any sort of positive vision for the country. They’re turning into reactionaries so whenever trump does some bastardized version of progressive policy, they don’t say we’ll do that but better, they say that’s dumb and we won’t do it at all. So anyone who wants the current system to change ( a majority of americans) they see trump as the only one who’s even trying it.

    If Trump says he’s gonna bring peace to the middle east, they need to point out how shitty his plan is and how bad he is at negotiating and then give a better plan, not brag about there close connection to war mongering psychopaths in Israel.

    If trump says he’s gonna raise tarriffs to bring back jobs, they should point out how untargeted and useless they are and put forward a plan to use them in combination with industrial policy to make green industry in America, like China did.

    If trump is taking 10% of intel to probably just sit on, they should say we’ll use that stake to guarantee workers rights and to keep jobs in America, not call it communism like some reincarnation of Joseph McCarthy.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is the most braindead comment I’ve read here yet. Google search Democratic Party Platform and you’ll find a 92 page document covering everything you pretend to be looking for. Now Google the Republican Party platform, and you’ll find it’s "Whatever Trump wants at any moment’.

      You could be complaining out of sheer ignorance, which is a common feature in today’s political environment, when a simple Google search has the answers for the ‘do your own research’ generation, or you are being disingenuous on purpose to push the Both Sides Same narrative.

      • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Google search Democratic Party Platform and you’ll find a 92 page document covering everything

        Well, I checked it for the issues I care about and there was simply no mention at all. It also appears to have been written by an AI, because it is a giant word salad of meaningless buzzwords.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Ironically it’s a messaging issue. Trump did great with nuh uhing Hillary and just talking up whatever hed do instead rather than saying what it is. The dems need to move to what Bernie did, you scream loudly about what you need done and what the problem is and you tell them that they’ve been having a hard time.

        Ironically yeah, this is an action I would’ve supported anyone else doing, its just that Trump is so wildly irresponsible and vindictive I suspect hes going to just meddle with the economy on culture war bullshit. Also the whole repealing subsidies that were a great first option before they had the chance to play out

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Who gives a flying fuck what you can google? I would have hard time believing them if they were saying it every day on live TV. Some documents barely tied to any politician without loud commitment is not worth the disk space it is occupying.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I am not, nor any normal person, is gonna read that 92 page platform. I am commenting about the messaging they are giving to the masses, like it or not orders of magnitude more people see these Gavin tweets then there platform and this is what’s informing there view of the democrats, and that view is terrible. They are at a 30 year low in approval rating, even with the unpopularity of trump to play off. What do you think explains this if not shitty messaging? Cause I think we can both agree there platform is nominally better then the Republicans, yet your average person doesn’t believe that.

        And the Republicans did have a platform, it was project 2025 and it was full of a lot of extremely unpopular shit. Did that stop them from winning all three branches of government? No, because no one reads a platform.

        • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          So you can’t be bothered to read the Democratic Party’s platform, their vision, but you have plenty of time to spend leaving excessively long complaints about how they don’t have a vision. Gotcha.

        • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I believe a piece of it that real solutions a)take a long time to come to fruition (often decades - solar power was proped up by subsidies for a generation before it became economical on its own) and b)have costs (eg making housing more broadly affordable makes it a worse investment) and many people aren’t going to take that shit. Solutions next year at no cost (or only at a cost to “other” people) or die.

          So any politician who proposes real solutions that can work can’t get votes. Politicians who propose fantasy solutions get voted in over and over, because even when their solutions don’t pan out, “at least they are trying.”

          • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I agree with you that there are certain issues that will require long incremental complex change that is hard to sell to a populace addicted to short simple sound bites. I also believe there are a lot of issues that can be implemented in a congressional term that can be summarized easily, but dems refuse to do them because it would require large systemic change that there donors don’t want. Messages like Medicare for all, free childcare, student loan forgiveness all funded by a wealth tax on billionaires. This is a very popular, simple message you can give to the masses while at the same time laying out those long term complex technocratic plans for those who care.

            The dems are only giving those technocratic plans though, and it shows as less and less non-college educated people are voting democrat. We can say theyre just stupid sheep but those sheep are a majority of the population and if we don’t cater to them, we’ll never win another election.

            • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              The examples you give aren’t popular enough, in enough right places (since legislative representation is uneven) to get the 60 Senate seats of support required to make them law. At least in part because the donor and lobbying class opposes them as currently framed, but enough voters are swayed by donor-class-funded messaging to prevent voting in sufficient supportive legislators.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        This is the most braindead comment I’ve read here yet.

        OP’s, comment is the most fire comment on this platform.

        Stop buying into the propaganda the DNC puts out. The DNC platform can say whatever the fuck it wants they don’t actually do any of it when they get in power. When have they ever actually fought for the things in their party platform?

        Fact: Unless you’re 80+ years old, you’ve never seen a Democratic Party like that. 

        Ironically, Eisenhower, a Republican was the last administration to do anything approaching what the Democratic Party platform says.  Stop lapping up propaganda and look at reality.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        These people are bound and determined to not have learned their lesson. Let them hate Gavin like they did Kamala. At this point, I’m curious to see how much shit their side can take in their little anti-good protest for perfect.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Dems are also all bark, no bite. Hard to get behind a consistently weak, losing team. We finally got a few “squeaky wheels” hoping to make some change. After Bernie got shafted, fuck DNC too. America is bought and paid for, all higher ups are in on it. They only go into politics to fatten their wallets. Fuck you pelosi and anyone else benefiting from insider trading.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now you are getting it, they enjoy when you call them nazis, gotta play around that

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, calling the fascist doing fascist things as “socialism” is definitely not something that a party in Germany did in the 1930s.

      Why should we care if they like or dislike what we call them? No one is trying to convince the Nazis.

      Putting a hammer and sickle next to Trump is an insult to the number one Nazi killers in history.

      Socialist are the number one killers and fighters against Fascism in history. And second place isn’t even close.

      Trump using the government to increase the value of corporations is only “socialism” if you completely ignore everything that Marx or Lenin ever wrote.

      This is just more “socialism is when the government does stuff”. Zero understanding of class conflict and interest.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fascists calling eachother communists like this on Twitter while working class people cheer them on for being so funny is just not the future I envisioned or wanted.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    From my post elsewhere in response to Trump’s post.

    That’s socialism, right? Maybe not because the workers won’t own the means of production, the government will. Which is communism. Well 10% communism? Well, starting out at the introductory rate of 10%. I’m sure that Trump will demand more in the future.

    Remember when Republicans talked about the free market, government not picking winners and losers, free trade, etc? They are being conspicuously silent on the government taking over part of a major company. Imagine if Obama started buying stakes in companies? You don’t have to. The federal reserve did it via quantitative easing during the 2008 crash. They pumped trillions into companies to keep them afloat during Obama’s term and the Republicans that knew about it had a hissy fit. But they are all quiet now. Nothing to say. It’s okay for the government to have a little corporate ownership as a treat. Even though they called it fascism for years.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s socialism, right?

      The Marxist definition of socialism is that the government owns the means of production. That definition prevailed during the Cold War when you had such socialist countries. Communism is a utopian state which is promised to come after socialism. It’s the system of a post-scarcity society where you don’t have property because everything is abundant. The state withers away because it is no longer needed. Basically, it’s a society like in Star Trek. In Marxist thought, the development is: feudalism->capitalism->socialism->communism

      Of course, it’s not wrong using the term “socialism” more loosely.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Under any definition it is most definitely not something that would have been acceptable to most Republicans if done by a Democrat.

        • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah. It’s pretty funny. It made me think of some of the rather conservative takes that are passed off as leftism on lemmy, which is how I got the title. Of course, meddling in the economy is straight fascism, too, of course. I really wish I had chosen something else now.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fuck Newsom, but his twattering is apparently amusing to some of my very dejected friends who’ve been in a rut post-2024 election, and that’s worth something. Hopefully the combativeness spreads.

  • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean yeah, he’s doing what leftists could only dream of, he’s destroying American imperialism

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The point was to spread it to the whole world. Mission Accomplished!

      If you were paying attention during the Cold War when the US was overthrowing democratic governments and installing fascist dictators you would have already known.

      The war is over there is no need for central control anymore. Welcome to your fascist world.