• ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fun fact: I once saw a cat trying to enter someone’s home, standing outside the door and meowing and trying to reach the handle, and I knocked on the door to tell the homeowner that their cat wanted in.

    Then the home owner came and told me that they never saw this cat before a day in their lives.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you let your cat outside your an inconsiderate awful human being

    They destroy local fauna and people’s properties

    Keep your cat inside

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s definitely that bad if you know how bad it is and still do it.

      We all know what happens when people feel persecuted for ignorance though, they just make that thing part of their identity. Hell, without even checking I bet there’s already a cat owner subculture that glorifies letting cats out in full knowledge of the harm.

      …Humans are so fucking annoying, aren’t they?

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Eh, it’s honestly not as bad as what most people make it out to be. The idea that non-feral cats are blood thirsty extinction machines is largely the product of people not being very good at interpreting scientific studies.

        The majority of studies about cats being killing tens of billions of birds a year is based on data extrapolated from a few studies of feral cats or the introduction of cats to islands. Introducing any new species of plant or animal can be devastating to island habitats, so that data shouldn’t be utilized when applied to the norm. And the studies of birds being killed on the mainland confirm that the majority of birds are being killed by feral cats, who have a much much greater predatory drive than the normal house cat.

        If we take away any understanding from these studies it should be that if we want to save more birds, people should try and domesticate feral cats, or at least feed them to minimize their predation of birds.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh for sure, it’s definitely better for the cats and the environment to keep them inside. I just don’t think perfect should be the enemy of good.

            I’ve just met some people who are militant to the point where they want to euthanize all outdoor cats. When in reality we could make a ton of progress by just feeding strays and getting them spayed and neutered.

            I have about half a dozen of the neighborhood ferals that I’ve gotten spayed and neutered. They won’t ever be lovey dovy indoor cats, but they are fed, lazy, and completely uninterested in our bird feeders anymore.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s a great thing you’re doing for them and the local environment. I heartily applaud it.

              My aunt is a stray cat fancier, but she does it with the misguided goal of someday winning their love. I think she finds the remoteness of their affection enthralling, and I can’t tell if it’s toxoplasmosis or emotional immaturity.

              I like your approach better. Live and let live, I say.

    • glitch1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Couldn’t agree more. Make sure you pickup your dogs shit but it’s fine for fluffy to kill all the local wildlife and turn the flowerbox into its litterbox.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      English spelling is trash, but in fairness, if it’s “meow”, then “meowing” does seem logical.

      Still, utter trash.

      Spelling Bees are English telling on itself.

      Kind regards, A terrible, but unashamedly so, first-language English speller.

    • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve seen it spelt both meow and miaow in the UK. My old Little Oxford dictionary (1986 edition) only has the miaow spelling, with mew as the variation. Meow isn’t even in it.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Huh, we also spell it like that in Germany. Surely this is the same for entirely normal reasons…

        • Pechente@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, most languages read vowels somewhat similarly. It’s English that differs from the norm and therefore often has „weird“ spellings, especially for onomatopoeia.

          See Great Vowel Shift

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yeah English teachers in my country start the first lesson by telling you that in English you don’t pronounce words exactly as written. Because in Estonian, each letter has exactly one sound. Grammatical context can change the length of the sound, but not really the sound itself.

            Also it’s spelled mjäu.