• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      That doesn’t matter for this original statement:

      If the CIA helped that’s fine, people like that should not be in power.

      We also don’t know if the FBI killed MLK. Does that mean that we can’t condemn them if they did it?

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re saying it’s okay if they helped but not saying to what extent it is okay to them, does murdering people count as helping etc. By asking you might get a feel what sort of actions they’re okay with.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re saying it’s okay if they helped but not saying to what extent it is okay to them

          It is imperialism either way. No matter the degree.

          does murdering people count as helping etc.

          Depends on who you ask. Both imperialism and covert murder by the state are done in the interest of the enacting nation. And I refuse to confuse these interests with my own (or those of “the people”).

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I just don’t think it counts as covert violence you mentioned earlier if CIA isn’t party to or in some degree involved in the violence

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              But we’re talking hypotheticals here. Of course it’s not violence if it didn’t occur.

              Let’s say I say the statement: “It’s ok if I kick puppies!” Is that stance ok to have, if I’ve never kicked a puppy?

              • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                But they weren’t explicitly condoning violence as you are doing in your example. So again it’s not the same

                  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    They’re condoning helping to oust Yanukovych. If that counts as imperialism then yes they seem to be condoning at least that specific action, though we don’t know the extent of the help they’re condoning. But you were talking about covert violence, I don’t think they said anything about that