• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hope everyone that keeps down voting me for talking about WW3 are right…

    But man, it really is starting to look like WW3

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      People forgot how long it took the other world wars to really get rolling. (Presumably because they weren’t alive when it happened.)

      I’m also of the opinion that unless something happens to de-escalate this conflict it will inevitably draw Europe, the US, and China in.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        They also forget about the 4+1 treaty.

        If Israel expands to other countries, it would draw Russia in on their side, and the US on Israel’s

        Which now also brings NK in. And we’ve got a multi front multi country war with two distinct fronts.

        People might not call it WW3, but there’s a world war coming straight ahead, and as good of a movie as it was, I dont want to recreate the Titanic

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Everybody is already in and picked the side…

        We just waiting for the other shoe to drop… Is US Marines landing in Crimea or other wild scenario where everyone goes: " well damn and that’s how it turned into ww3"

        • bluGill@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          We are also hoping it doesn’t turn into WWIII. It could for sure, but there is the possibility that things can calm down in a few years.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      To me it looks like N Korea wanting to acquire some direct combat experience to continue to develop their skills and capabilities.

      But yes, personally I was not expecting this.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They didn’t start calling WWII what it is until 1944, but I think we can all agree it didn’t start in 1944.
      Just like later historians placed the start of WWII on multiple different events depending on which country you’re in, the start of World War III will be long before we start calling it that.
      I’m in the camp that the start of WW3 will be the Russian invasion of Ukraine if things continue to escalate the way they’re going, because that’s when you really started seeing lines being drawn between the axis and allies.
      Russia, China, Iran, and NK are the most recognizable names that have aligned themselves with the axis so far.
      The lines are already drawn and future events will dictate whether or not we’re currently living in WW3 today.

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        And some would argue that WW1 was WW2 and WW2 WAS WW3. The 7 years war/French and Indian (not French vs Indian) war are commonly referred to as the real first world war. And then the Nepoleonic wars are similarly thought of by some to have been a world war of sorts

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not really, proxy wars have been fought with multiple nations before.

      … practically everyone was in Syria… Russia, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Qatar, The USA, ISIS, Al-queda, and Syrian forces.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

        • Mechanize@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Russia is actively in Syria from the end of 2015 as an official belligerent, it’s not something new for Russia to fight directly while others use only proxies.

          But I can see your point; still - officially - this is only a three days military operation. When that stance will finally change in the official channels, it will mean they can’t hold the mask anymore.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

          Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To me, it does not seem wise to just let these two continue along this path, but I am certain there are numerous internet experts out there who can explain to me why we should not intervene.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 months ago

        How would you propose the intervention happen? Sit Kim down and say “bad boy, stop it”?

        What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

        Russia isn’t going to stop them from crossing their border.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

          Drop leaflets on them inviting them to surrender and upgrade their lives to South Korean national.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        You mean Russia and NK?

        Or you meant the two countries in the middle of illegal invasions: Russia and Israel?

        • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fuck Israel, but that being said what the hell does Israel have to do with anything here?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Israel and Hezbollah have been exchanging rocket fire, and Israel is talking about a ground invasion.

            Hezbollah has a defense treaty with Iran, Iraq, Russia, and another ME country I’m blanking on.

            If Israel invaded Lebanon in an attack on Hezbollah, that draws in Russia, and likely NK.

            Israel and Russia are the two countries invading others that I believe are the primary drivers towards WW3. NK is just a long for the ride until/unless they launch an attack on SK.

            But I think before that happens, we’ll solidly be in WW3. I think NK is onboard now, with the promise to be backed against SK later. No one is attack NK unless NK starts some shit, they don’t need a defense treaty.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      But man, it really is starting to look like WW3

      It looks more like Crimean War II to me.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I honestly think he might legitimately believe that a couple platoons of NK soldiers will clear this whole mess right up and then the world will have to take them seriously.

        The North Korean leadership is not exactly well known for their excellent grasp of reality.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          My thought is maybe either food or arms or research for arms production/nukes from the Russians.

          Edit Addendum: the article says as much actually lol. This is what I get for just trying to get an idea of NK actions from the title.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not to worry! Li’l Kim’s Bestest Buddy and Honorary Number One Chief Saluter will be ready to help NK help Russia destroy Ukraine and NATO.

    All you MAGA service “losers” and “suckers” got quite the cognitive dissonance jam rockin’ huh.

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    So it’s OK for Ukraine to invite friends along to help too?

    • Furball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the US announced it would lift the ban on American contractors going to Ukraine at the same time as this. Russia reaps what it sows. Ukraine gets highly payed and skilled contractors, in return, Russia gets malnourished and untrained Korean conscripts.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The North Koreans are perfect for the Russian tactic of forcing the Ukrainians to deplete their ammo by throwing meat at them.

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I dont think it’s quite the same thing though. US contractors won’t be fighting, I think they’ll just be maintaining and repairing equipment.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Arguably, a much more critical job for a capital-intensive army.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, it’s actually huge. Especially for maintaining a weapon as complicated as an Abrams tank. If it can be repaired close to the front lines then that has the potential to cut days off the turnaround time compared to towing it over to Poland.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Russia gets malnourished and untrained Korean conscripts.

        Just offer them all plane tickets to South Korea. Problem solved.

    • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      According to Russian propaganda Ukraine has been doing just that the entire time, but if it actually happened that would be yet another red line to cross.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Time to translate those surrender instruction leaflets to Korean. Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe that’s the tactic, force Ukraine to divert food and resources to feeding thousands of Korean deserters.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

      Or just invite the South Korean government to send agents to Ukraine to invite them all to South Korea.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    These guys will have a better time in Ukrainian captivity than 99% of the population at home…

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We’re getting a lot closer to a bigger global conflict as NK troops and American Military contractors begin to enter the fray. Anyone else feel like were inching closer to World War than we’ve been since the last one ended?

    • mecfs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’ve been inching closer and closer ever since 2014. Is not an excuse to abandon Ukraine though. Russia won’t stop cause we give them some land.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 months ago

        Appeasement didn’t stop Hitler in the 30s and 40s. It won’t stop Putin now. It never works.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This isn’t going to do anything. First of all, North Korea is probably not going to send battle ready soldiers to a foreign country. There’s really no reason for it. They might send ditch diggers for trenches.

      Second of all, this isn’t going to move the needle on the battlefield. Russia already has more troops than Ukraine. They need more and better arms and ammunition, plus better support, training, airplanes, missiles, drones, commanders, etc. Basically Russia needs a completely different military.

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts? Blackrock would ruin these morons!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So did I hear that the US is considering letting “contractors” take Ukrainian contracts?

      The US has been sending “advisers” into Ukraine since the war began. And we’ve had intelligence officers in this country for decades.

      Blackrock would ruin these morons!

      Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious, and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does north korea have actually good military power? I’ve seen their parades here and there, but does anyone know if they have updated equipment, trained military personnel, good intelligence, etc?

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They have massive amount of soldiers and are good and making artillery and missiles. It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

      Their economy is practically built for conflict so it shouldn’t be taken lightly.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

        They’ve been deployed to Syria since at least 2019 and assisted Hezbollah in its tunnel networks going back decades.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So does that mean that NATO can also start deploying troops there? I mean, so far we’ve kept out to not escalate this, but if actual foreign troops will set foot on that front line, you can only wait so long for the other side to do the same…

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No, because Ukraine is not a NATO member because they cannot join while already at war. If the USA got involved directly then the international community in the UN and even NATO itself would have mixed responses, perhaps even leading to NATO withdrawals and economic sanctions.

      However, the USA have started allowing private mercenary companies to participate directly in the conflict, and they’ve had indirect support specialists from the US Military in the region for a long time.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      According to hexbear you would have to have some deranged lib mind to believe any would want to.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        NKers are simultaneously brainwashed morons who follow their leader with fanatical delusion and utterly naive children who can be lured to defection by a few pieces of candy and a charming smile.

        The hexbears are too stupid to realize that all Koreans yearn for the unlimited freedom of their Southern neighbors and yet too wicked to believe the unvarnished truths of such media luminaries as Yeomni Park. They should all be sent to North Korea to eat grass and toil in the mines and get beaten to a pulp by Kim’s totalitarian police, then repatriated so that they can apologize for their ignorant beliefs.

  • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    89
    ·
    5 months ago

    If US and NATO are supporting Ukraine I didn’t see what’s the problem if China and North Korea support Russia…

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t see the difference in supporting a country defending itself from being invaded versus aiding a country that is invading?

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s almost like Ukraine is better than NK, from a moral and logical perspective. Ukraine isn’t starving their own people, nor are they “disappearing” the local Muslim population á-la China. They’re simply defending themselves.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        5 months ago

        Remind me how many Neo-Nazi battalions are in the DPRK? Or where in the DPRK constitution there is a provision to protect their gene pool?

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What does that have to do with anything? Are you attempting to say Ukraine has those and therefore all of Ukraine deserves to be killed? Good job attempting to change the subject, I guess. Better invade every country on earth since Nazis are literally everywhere, civilian casualties be damned. Better invade your own country too.

          PS. Russia does not actually care about Nazis, they have their own after all. They only want Ukraine’s land, ports, and people.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The Neo-Nazis are in Russia working with NK.

          The Axis of Evil

          Treason Trump - War Criminal Putin - Caligula Jong Un - Comrade Xi

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        57
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        According to you logic US it’s supporting Israel so I believe your “moral” and “logic” is pretty twisted…

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The US isn’t sending troops into Gaza. This story is about NK sending troops into Ukraine. It’s not hard to see the clear difference.

          • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            51
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Nice slippery slope…

            Edit: Israel didn’t even need soldiers, Palestinians didn’t even have weapons to defend themselves and are starving to death, so money and weapons will do the work to continue with the genocide.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Huh? In what way was what I said a “slippery slope”? This article is literally talking about NK sending troops to Ukraine. I wasn’t even the one to bring up NATO or the US in the first place.

              I wholeheartedly believe Palestine should be freed and that we shouldn’t be supplying weapons at all. The genocide is disgusting. But at least the US isn’t using US troops, nor are they doing trade deals to send more poor people into Gaza (like NK and Russia are doing in this article, except in Ukraine instead of Gaza).

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          There they are! The gENoSiDe JoE contingent. Still a bunch of y’all wandering around unblocked. Not to worry!

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Financial support and sending foreign soldiers directly to the frontline are two very different kinds of involvement. Imagine the Russian freakout if NATO actually sent soldiers to fight in Ukraine. Maybe the North Koreans will actually speed that process up.

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      If China directly supports Russia NATO will throw sanctions on them and that will hurt China. China is supporting Russia, but they are walking a find line as China cannot afford to make NATO mad. (NATO also will hurt, which is why NATO is looking the other way, but how long will NATO put up with China is an open question)

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        All the west should sanction China. But we need to have toilet paper production back onshore first.