• flora_explora@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    How do you define “wasp” though? All Hymenoptera? All Apocrita? All Apocrita minus Apoidea and/or Formicidae? All Vespoidea (minus Formicidae?)? Only Vespidae?

    What about all the parasitic wasps? All fig trees would die and with them whole food webs. And if all the parasitic wasps that hold other organisms in check would die, this would also lead to a total disruption of so many biomes…

  • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The small section of mosquitoes that bite humans actually don’t serve a critical niche like that, and just spread disease. Why the idea has been floated at sterilizing them.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    i am under the impression that mosquitos, as an invasive species, do not fill an important ecological niche and could go extinct and be replaced by other insects

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This has been a common sentiment but it hasn’t been proven in any substantial way to my knowledge. I personally doubt it’s accurate. That’s not to say the entire ecosystem would collapse but there would likely be consequences.

      That said, the other commenter is correct that there are many introduced mosquito species that could probably be eradicated from their non-native range without major ecological harm. And the species that are the worst pests in human cities tend to be introduced, so eliminating them might significantly reduce the level of bites and disease transmission for people.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Mosquitos are a nuisance to every mammal, I think if we could talk to animals this is how it would go down

        Human: “So anyways we’ve been mulling over making the mosquito extinct, but it might have some consequences for yo…”

        Mammals: “WTF BRO YOU COULD HAVE DONE THAT THE ENTIRE TIME! WHY TF ARE YOU STILL HERE GET RID OF THOSE FUCKERS!”

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          TBF humans historically have been pretty lax in doing anything simply because it was a good thing to do

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah I mean the ethics of how humans relate to wild mammals are so complicated and confusing that I’m not even going to go there.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      3 days ago

      The mosquito one is absolutely BS, there’s 6k+ species of mosquitoes but only like a couple bite humans

      The bats and shit will be fine, it’s time to eradicate mosquitoes!

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I thought some of the specific mosquitoes that prey on humans can be killed with little side effects. Or is that just my cognitive bias dreaming of a better world

  • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ok but I still think the mosquito thing is worth a try. I’m even willing to live alongside wasps but mosquitoes gotta go!

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nothing evolves to have a purpose, something just mutated by chance that happens to serve a beneficial function to the environment and other organisms

    Also I’m pretty sure birds, bats and plants can eat other bugs

    What’s the statistics on bug food for birds and plants ?

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Statistics on bug food??? For birds and plants??? Do you want the whole thing dumped here in the comments? Or do you mean “do birds eat insects”? Yes. A lot.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Diets are highly species specific, but mosquitos are generally less than 3% of the diet for most birds and bats. Too small, don’t fly around at the correct time of day/night, and pretty agile, so they aren’t supper important for most birds and bats.

      Also, usually they hatch in the billions all at once and die within a few weeks so there’s a very limited amount of time that they even can be preyed on as food. Their strategy (many of them, not all species) is to overwhelm any predators with numbers.

  • Klnsfw 🏳️‍🌈@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Species do not exist for a purpose. They are important in their ecosystem, that’s all.

    And even if they don’t have a role, that doesn’t make their existence any less valuable.

  • randomname@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If screworms went extinct there wouldn’t be any animals starving… same with a lot of pests. guinea worm for example.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    How many species of birds and bats eat just mosquitoes though, or a high enough percentage that they would go extinct rather than shift to rely more on their other prey species, even if at a smaller population? And are those particular species of birds and bats worth the consequences of having mosquitoes?

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which would maybe force some other animals to change their behaviour slightly more, which in turn affects yet other species. And so the butterfly effect rolls on.

      Or it doesn’t and the system stabilises in another state. Who knows, can we actually know it with a high enough certainty or are the dependencies and behavioural guesses too complex?

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, has the system ever not eventually stabilized in another state? The fact that we have had extinctions, quite a lot of them even involving most species that have ever existed, and yet complex life and ecosystems still exist, would suggest that life will find a way to adapt around such a loss given time.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    We are the only species out of the ecologic system, we need the nature, but the nature don’t need us.