Ocasio-Cortez took to Instagram after the Department of Homeland Security suggested they may pursue arrests of three Democratic lawmakers who partook in a protest outside of an ICE facility in Newark, New Jersey. Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), Rob Menendez (D-NJ) and LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) all attended the protest.

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Fun to think about, but American males are not ready for a strong female presence in their lives. They can’t handle it.

      I would love for AOC to show the world her fire and Americans some grace. Not going to happen with the lot in America right now sadly.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t know if American men are ready for it, but neither Harris nor Clinton were strong presidential candidates, and not because of their gender.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          it was soely sexism, the fact you dont think that means your also kinda sexists too.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            44 minutes ago

            Spreading the delusional belief that it was solely sexism is sexist because it discourages people from voting for a woman.

            Clinton and Harris were both absolutely shitty candidates. AOC is not, and can rally a huge segment of voters who previously stayed home.

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          but neither Harris nor Clinton were strong presidential candidates, and not because of their gender.

          That’s a bunch of bs. It was sexism, pure and simple.

          Clinton was an accomplished lawyer and accomplished civil servant in her own right, having spent her entire life in service. As former first lady, she had exclusive access to the inner machinations of the presidency (I’m not saying that being the spouse of an elected leader alone qualifies one for that position (see Republicans’ voting for dead candidates and swapping the deceased’s spouse in after the election)), but rather adds to the cumulative total. She was also the head of the state department.

          And because of a successful attack at a foreign embassy in a hostile nation, that became a millstone around her neck that trumpers bashed her for, capping off an otherwise stellar career.

          Against that orange buffoon, on paper, she should have mopped the floor with his toupe’

          Harris was VP, senator, Attorney General. She didn’t have the cv of Clinton, but she was a woman, and she had a foreign sounding name. I worked as an election inspector (not the jackoff people who challenge voter’s ability to vote, but the people who conduct the election at the local jurisdiction level). The election room as a smallish town hall, and many couples came in to vote together. The amount of people who were speaking loud enough to be overheard saying things like: “never vote for a woman” or making referring to “white pride” was shockingly scarry. They wanted to be heard.

          Why, yes, I live in a racist, misogynistic hellhole - how’d you guess?

          • Soulg@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The idea that they lost only because of sexism is the most delusional shit I’ve ever fucking heard, oh my God

            • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Please tell me these are bot accounts because otherwise wow I agree that is truly brain worms level stuff

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            14 hours ago

            The amount of people who were speaking loud enough to be overheard saying things like: “never vote for a woman” or making referring to “white pride” was shockingly scarry. They wanted to be heard.

            None of those people were ever going to vote Democrat

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Both were trying to cater to people on the fence and lost the vote of people further left in that pursuit…

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Personally, I don’t think we should allow any men to be president. Just of think of how absurd it is. We keep electing a bunch of testosterone-addled rage junkies to be in charge of the nuclear button. Men are just too emotional to be president, or even leaders in general. They’re just as likely to take off their pants and start waiving their dicks at each other as they are to come up with something that even meets the definition of “policy.” Electing a man a leader is like electing a rabid inbred gorilla hopped up on PCP as a leader.

            Men belong in the home. That’s their rightful place. That way they don’t have to spend too much time seeing other men, which only inspires rage reflexes in them. You let two men meet and they start beating their chests and trying to assert dominance over each other, usually while stripping off clothing and pulling out firearms. Men have no place in politics, business, or any field that really matters. Men should be kept in the home where they can’t do too much damage.

            But a man as president? Comically absurd. Literal clown world. How could such irrational, angry, emotionally fragile beings ever be elected a leader?

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Clinton was part of the Clinton Crime Family and Harris was a cop. Terrible choices.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Male here. Hillary was probably the worst female option who’s ever ran for president.

        Kamala wasn’t much better, and felt like a rush job to prevent Biden being an easy sweep.

        Not that I’m advocating for trump in either case. I’m just saying its like the old south park joke of douche vs turd sandwich.

        Only difference is that AOC is actually a good choice. Whereas Hillary and Kamala were never good choices.

        I would fully support an AOC run. I would vote FOR AOC. Whereas with Hillary and Kamala it felt like it was voting against trump by selecting “whoever the opposition is”.

        Which for the record, isn’t a gender thing. Biden was also “not trump” on the ballots in 2020. You didn’t vote FOR Biden. You voted AGAINST trump.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Hillary likely would have made a great moderate president. She was a “bad choice” only because Fox News attacked her for 20 years.

          • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Downvotes but she was a cool hippy chick once. Neoliberal was the game she chose to play and it might have worked if she played more on the radical side

      • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You need to rephrase that as “falsely ex-MAGAt American males who will immediately vote Republican next election despite claiming they were moving a sub from it for our sympathy and so they wouldn’t face the consequences they deserve” aren’t ready…

      • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        People are downvoting you, and as much as I would like it to not be true, you are right. There’s too many male dems I’ve talked to that didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman. It was shocking, and disappointing to say the least.

        So I can’t, in good conscience, downvote you, because you’re not wrong, as much as I don’t like it.

        • jimjam5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          My brain has a conniption whenever I try to see how women could vote against other accomplished successful women, their own interests, and instead for a misogynistic ugly orange rapist. Like I’m done trying to understand the stupidity. 🙄

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Maybe stop with the strawman argument and you’d get a bit further. Myself, and I’m sure plenty of others, are really sick of being painted as a villain before even entering the conversation. All you’re doing is furthering the divide, not shortening it.

        I see it all over Lemmy - angry liberals painting the opposition as vile and inhuman. Making all these strawman up. Makes other liberals not want to associate with you. Makes you seem just like the people you vilify.

        You want a society of love and acceptance? Start with yourself. Create a happy accepting vibe around yourself and make it grow from there. But don’t salt the ground and then wonder why nothing grows.

        Edit: hey geniuses downvotting me and calling me conservative scum: I’m a registered Democrat. Thanks for proving my point with more strawmen. You assume that if someone disagrees with you they’re immediately a MAGA Nazi instead of someone who legitimately disagrees with your methods and actions. You taint the discourse just as much as your opposition.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah no, ICE deported a four year old with stage four cancer.

          If you support the felon rapist who’s spent every single decade of his life an entitled shit destroying as many fucking lives as he could…

          Nah, if you voted for Trump that is the same in my book as supporting Hitler. Supporting Trump makes you a fascist, and there is only one cure for fascism.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Another great strawman. I’m a registered Democrat. Thank you for proving my point. Because only a conservative could disagree with you /s

              • fishos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                And yet when told I disagree with you you immediately go off about maga Nazis. That’s your strawman. You can’t stop foaming at the mouth about it while other Democrats are trying to have an actual conversation with you. Some of you are just as rabid as the people you hate.

                • andros_rex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  You haven’t made an argument to engage with. All you have said so far is “lefties are meanies!” Mild criticism is “foaming at the mouth.”

                  I think your problem is that you aren’t here in good faith, and that stink comes through the computer monitor.

                  • fishos@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Umm … My first post: maybe stop attacking everyone and you’d find more supporters. That is an argument. But you’ve been too busy… checks notes …attacking me endlessly. I started by critiquing someone saying males are too insecure to be governed by a woman. That maybe that kind of inflammatory language doesn’t help. And… Here you are being inflammatory and wondering why you aren’t winning.

                    Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          your comment is exactly what conservatives say " if you argue against a conservative than you are no better than they are" get over yourself.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nah, I’m a liberal getting sick of my own party and people for being hypocritical themselves.

        • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Do you want to stand for something or win elections and progress? I dont care about race or sex, just like you don’t, but that’s not the reality of America today.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      She’s great- but she’s not the revolutionary leader you need to do what’s necessary. She’s the person you need AFTERWARD to pick up the pieces.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I like the fantasy and I wish that’s where we were at, but please just give me a boring middle aged white guy. The people who love AOC the most apparently just aren’t going to show up at the polls in numbers. It’s a problem we’ve been talking about since I was the one not voting and we were blaming it on the way they treated green party candidates (I know, probably even longer). There’s a new excuse every few years, but there always is one and it doesn’t look like it’s changing any time soon.

      Please, let’s throw the old people a bone and give them an easy choice so we all don’t have to suffer again. I hate having to think about ‘electable’ too, but let’s just do that astronaut guy they were pushing for Harris’ running mate, they’d love that guy.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The people who love AOC the most apparently just aren’t going to show up at the polls in numbers.

        Cite your sources here

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        We just had a boring middle aged white guy and he spent his entire abandoned campaign pushing for genocide. Dems never learn basic humanity.

      • Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I feel like those people are never going to vote though. The communists and socialists will be too busy going on about bourgeoisie this and that and won’t be satisfied unless Marx himself is running because no one else is good enough. And the anarchists will go going “why should I take this opportunity to fight fascists if I’m not getting my perfect anarchist utopia out of it? Don’t vote, it’ll go against your perfect idealism.” Just like they did this last time around.

        I think that Bernie Sanders showed us that people who don’t have ideological sticks up their asses will be willing to vote for something better that gets us all a little bit closer to utopia, even if it’s not perfect yet. And as a non-American, I think AOC has that same infectious energy. But of course, as a non-American, I might also be underestimating how much Americans hate women and brown people.

    • PaulBunyan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Why doesn’t she already have a problem? I was hoping AOC would be leading the charge, but she’s more like a background character.

      This screams “it doesn’t matter until it’s me.”