• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    Breaking News.

    Man with vested interest in selling his services, insists buying his services is the only way to save us from the evil foreign menace

    • MrSmiley@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you read his book The Technological Republic, he calls for a « collectivist » ideology and the merger of corporation and state. A few historical examples to choose from would be Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia or Communist China to get an idea of his vision for America’s future.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man who is the CEO of a business selling mass surveillance beyond the likes of even George Orwell’s 1984 says we should run head first into a surveillance state from which he will directly profit from.

  • treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Look at this unfuckable loser. He’s like if someone glued Steve Bannon’s pubes to Steven Miller’s head. “Let us destroy all freedom in the USA so China doesn’t win the race to economically out-compete the USA” is as bullshit a justification as there has ever been for anything in the history of everything.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Palantir CEO Says a Surveillance State Is Preferable to China Winning the AI Race Planatir shareholders not getting rich fast enough

    Fixed it

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    China WILL win the AI race and that’s because they invested in infrastructure and their power grid.

    The US could have done that too, but we gave the money to billionaires instead. Building a surveillance state doesn’t fix any of the mistakes we made and they’ll still win the AI race.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not that. Because their IP and copyright and patent laws are softer, and also more bendable. In practice those laws don’t matter much.

      Now “AI”, surveillance and such are ways to bypass those stricter laws on IP in the west. Technologies exist in some socioeconomic context. A big company doing surveillance and “AI” breaking those laws doesn’t expose that it breaks those laws often, and when it does, it can sustain pressure to get its way.

      So the appeal of these technologies is to launder data. Which is, fundamentally, same as perfect obfuscation of executable code. And other such things.

      That’s money against right, money wants no reverse engineering, no alternative compatible software, no examination of what their stuff does, and no responsibility for the data used. While in right, of course, examination and compatible tools being possible and verifiable supply chain and so on are basic for industrial civilization.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not to sound like a tankie but China has made smarter decisions with regard to power generation. The current shift away from renewables (and shift back to fossil fuel) AND more reliance on central power generation are great for billionaires but just dumb for every other reason. And with the what appears to be advancing in battery technology more distributed solar cells with local storage would free up more power for the power hungry data centers. Not to mention the AI programs there are not run by douchebags like Sam Altman and Mustafa Suleyman.

      I also think the current path of AGI study via more advanced LLM research is the wrong path. A language generator is never going to be “smart”. But what do I know, I don’t have billions of dollars and lie constantly.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not Tankie to admit aspects of reality. China is doing some things well. China has spent the last 20 years investing in itself, America has spent the last 20 years investing in other countries for a possible ROI for the military-industrial complex.

        What would be Tankie would be to then extrapolate from that and say they’re actually the best state in the world and anyone who says otherwise is a imperialist brainwashed pigdog.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        So we need to start covert anti-corruption efforts n China, since China will win, we don’t want a single party member destroying the world…I don’t know what we can actually do, but it is crucial for the human race that China develops more benevolent values if at all possible.

        • I don’t know what we can actually do

          Make it easier for Chinese Nationals to study abroad, educate them on the idea of government transparency, separation of powers, checks and balances, the idea that government legitimacy comes from the people, idea of social contract, etc… Hope they bring back the knowledge to fix the country from within.

          (Btw, Overseas Chinese helped topple the Qing Regime and ended monarchism.)

          • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I get a sense that in the CCP, you wouldn’t get into any position with actual influence unless your peers and superiors have some leverage on you (they know you’ve done done shady shit which they can expose if you become a nuisance).

            So in that way, actually interparty radicalism is curtailed.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The public needs public mass surveillance on CEOs and the top 1% only. They are the top threat to the world

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      1000% this.

      They’re predators, both sexually and economically, and society has let them get away with their plans for far too long.

    • voldage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is that quick and funny operation that you can do using guilotine (or anything you can get your hands on if you’re creative enough!) that significantly reduce the need for oversight. I agree we should put monitoring around the mass grave in case those ghouls can actually get up. It’s a stretch, but better safe than sorry.

  • FarrellPerks@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Owner of surveillance apparatus reckons we should all just chill and accept total surveillance”

    This fucking dude.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like seriously, in what reality are these two things NOT mutually exclusive? Also doesn’t palantir have contracts with China?