• MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Tear it all down” is for weak minded imbeciles who get frustrated trying to confront issues and think of practical resolutions.

    • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, it’s for people outside the relative bubble of safety you enjoy in the imperial core. Your country has been on the wrong side of every war it’s fought since WWII, resulting in the deaths of tens of millions of innocent civilians. You’ve had 80 years to get your shit together, you don’t get unlimited chances. Death to America.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I find “tear it all down” people hilarious. Like… yea, ok, we’ll tear it all down. And who’s gonna rebuild after? You and your keyboard?

      • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        revolutionaries will do it, just like the bolsheviks did.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The Bolsheviks relied on existing structures, functionaries and specialists because they HAD to. Nothing else was possible, they existed in the real world in the midst of a civil war, not some childish fantasy.

          Trotsky aggressively recruited Tsarist military officers, many of which served without really aligning with Bolshevism.

          And just a few other facts to add: world war, civil war, famine, coercion, mass violence, dependemce on inherited infrastructure and harsh repression. That’s what you want for the US? Because real people, the ones not playing make believe on the internet, do not.

          • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I never denied that revolutionaries in the US shouldnt utilize already existing state apparatus, do you even understand what collapsing means?

            Change requires sacrifices, but american left thinks americans need to babysat into revolution, america is already inflicting civil war, famine, coercion, mass violence and harsh repression on many countries.

    • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      hilarious to say this as your entire political position is to vote every 4 years and slowly see the people moving closer towards fascism and still saying “we will do it slowly!!”

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I vote more often than that and if more people did, society would be more aligned with that they want. But most don’t, because stupid fucking morons like yourself convince them it doesn’t matter.

        • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Voting does matter

          Voting democrats however dont

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Voting democrats however dont

            Are you aware that not enough people vote 3rd party for a 3rd party to be viable?

            Are you aware that no 3rd party is putting in the effort to make people want to vote for them?

            Are you aware that it’s possible to reform political parties, but not if we descend to deeply into actual fascism due to an actual fascist party being in control?

            So wouldn’t it make sense, in that scenario, to vote for a party that isn’t actually fascist (despite what tankies believe) so that we can have a less oppressive situation that is more likely to foster the kind of change that could potentially make a 3rd party viable some day?

            I mean, unless you want to become a historical figure by starting a violent revolution. For which I hope you have a post-war plan so things don’t collapse even more.

            • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              If you dont try to build a 3rd party, they will never become viable

              You cant reform a liberal imperialist party like the democrats who have a long history of pursuing imperialist capital goals. Its like saying “we will reform nazi party to be sympathetic to jews”

              • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                If you dont try to build a 3rd party, they will never become viable

                Have at it, champ. Maybe you should go talk to those 3rd parties and tell them to…do something?

                I guess in the meantime your goal is to whine about the only party that can win that isn’t actually fascist. Yes, I know you think both are equally fascist. I don’t care and am not responding to a stupid sentiment like that.

                • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Even you know both parties are:

                  1. Pro american hegemony
                  2. White supremacist
                  3. Zionist
                  4. Capitalist
                  5. Imperialist

                  The only thing they differ is on the culture war. There is not much difference if you really look at it

                  Maybe you should go talk to those 3rd parties and tell them to…do something?

                  I mean you guys call names to people who vote and organize for those parties, proves they are doing stuff for sure.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ok. I’ve read enough of your comments.

        What’s your solution to our general problem and what are you personally doing about it?

        • Tolc@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I am not an american to do anything about it

          My solution is to organize in an alternative party that is out of the bourgeoisie imperialist democratic party and put candidates from those parties in elections, however elections would be just one part, keep organizing and keep spreading class consciousness. If you are looking for immediate leftist gains through electoralism vote for a 3rd party that already has significant base like for example the green party.