• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    donald trump gets 10 warnings for intimidating witnesses and indefinite trial postponement for hoarding and most likely leaking classified documents. Sweet sweet justice.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      People keep trying to convince me it’s not evidence of two justice systems.

       

      But it is.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s evidence that we live in corporatocracies masquerading as “democracies”. The 0.1%, shielded by the liability protections of the corporations they own, and their armies of lobbyists — they finance our politics, choose who ends up on the ballot, and shadow write most of our legislation, policies, and regulations.

        Trump is free because he is a part of that < 0.1%.

        The Boeing execs who oversaw systemic fraud, lied to the FAA, and murdered 166 people still ARE FREE AND RICH. Why? Because they are the 0.1%.

        The IPCC hosts fossil fuelled climate summits in fossil fuel exporting countries, inviting fossil fuel corporations and lobbyists to attend — at a scientific conference about how to solve the crisis they created and profited from! why? Because we live in corporatocracies.

        • NoFuckingWaynado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If any country’s government spied on its own people as much as big business does in America, people would flip out. But in America, big business really is the government.

          We are so fucked…

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Good thing guillotines don’t care about wealth, only the size of your neck.

          We’ll just have to make the hole slightly larger to fit fatter necks.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s the subtle difference between a JUSTICE system and a LEGAL system.

        One aims to maintain law and order in society in a fair and equal way regardless of one’s status or situation.

        The other is a system gamed to benefit the richest and wealthiest individuals to get away with everything.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Someone should look up the maximum sentence for what he’s been charged with. The current biggest hold-ups are not being able to make someone appear in multiple trials in different places simultaneously, and avoiding the appearance that the court is trying to interfere with an election.

        You don’t want the court to not care about the appearance of interfering with elections, or else you’ll have the GoP trying to get Democrat politicians on dubious charges that they’ll definitely not be guilty of but will definitely bury them in scandal and prevent them from campaigning effectively.

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re not wrong, these Trump trial judges are bending over backwards to avoid any grounds for mistrial. In one sense they are doing the right thing inside the legal framework, but look at the downsides.

          The public is watching how a rich and powerful man can game the system, even as a criminal defendant the system is working for him. Every incarcerated person can see the reality: they were treated with default brutality, but Trump is treated as royalty.

          And even worse, they are allowing Trump to delay every verdict until after the election. If he wins the election he pardons himself, this is a horrible precedent for our democracy.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m fairly certain his conduct during the proceedings themselves would have landed me or anyone else in jail by now. (And/Or with a fine that required us to do more than lift up our couch cushions.)

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            (And/Or with a fine that required us to do more than lift up our couch cushions.)

            That’s a problem with the amount of fine being set by law and despite likely not being as wealthy as claimed, Trump still has enough money that $10k isn’t going to hurt him.

            Jailing him for contempt has all the same logistical problems imprisoning him is going to, but at a smaller, less secure facility.

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think this is a consequence of any (unregulated) capitalistic system in general. The system is founded on money, more money will give anyone more influence and power over the system

        • seaQueue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s a consequence of our “growth at all costs” take on capitalism. Capitalism is only livable for the average person when it’s kept in check by a strong government and corruption is vigorously prosecuted. We’ve decided that corruption just happens and there’s nothing we can do about it, and so there are no disincentives to corrupting government.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          This has nothing to do with an economic system. This same shit is worse even in communist systems, and I’m not even going to try and point fingers at that system and say it is.

          The real reason is because of power, and a class system that protects its own.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      For the record, Aaron Swartz never actually went to trial, nor was he “sentenced” to anything.

      Federal prosecutors came after him with overzealous charges in an effort to make him accept a plea deal (they do that a lot), which he rejected. It would have gone to court where the feds would have had to justify the charges they were bringing.

      But that never happened because he killed himself.

      We don’t actually know how this all would have played out.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The comment in OPs post is misleading but he did nevertheless kill himself because of the justice system trying to prosecute him for accessing science most likely funded by public money in the first place.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And will never know, selfishly speaking, the possible extent of his further contributions to society. Died at 26 after an incredible life already.

        Besides his life, what else did they steal from us?

        RIP Aaron

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      donald tr*mp gets 10 warnings for intimidating witnesses and indefinite trial postponement for hoarding and most likely leaking classified documents. Sweet sweet justice.

      Why are you censoring Donald Trump’s name? Is it a swear word now in your country?

      We’re big girls here, we can take a little rude language, don’t worry :)

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I don’t know why but i just didn’t want to type that slur. It’s edited now.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There are lots of funny spellings:-).

          One of the best imho is tRump, like Donald’s Rump.

          Or for those in the know, Drumpf.

  • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Shout out to Alexandra elbakyan. She continues part of aaron’s work by running sci-hub and libgen, but lives safely out of reach of the american criminal “justice” system 💔

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      With authors often paying for open access publications literally out of their very own money, not just grants.

      • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not at the time this happened. Aaron’s case was one of the motivating factors that led to the Open Access publication movement gaining enough traction that authors could publish that way. JSTOR access is paid for and administered on college campuses by libraries and librarians as a whole field felt terrible both about the paid publication system and the way Aaron was treated. As a community of professionals, the Librarian and Information Science community pushed very hard for the adoption of Open Access publishing into the Academic community.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Good to know we had something very good out of this.

          Now, let’s beat the living hell out of publishers so that those crazy open access publication prices would decimate.

          Because right now, I literally cannot afford publishing further than Q3, which already eats up most of my personal grant earnings (which are so bad I can say I work purely for an idea).

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s a reason the EU doesn’t extradite their citizens to the US: the justice system is considered inhumane.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Look, the kid was a hero, but this is also patently false.

    He was not sentenced to 35 years. The trial hadn’t started. 35 years was the maximum possible sentence. He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected.

    We don’t need to spin lies to make his story more tragic than it already is.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      35 years max, plea for 1/2 that was rejected. He was going to get the book thrown at him to make an example. 5 years minimum but I wouldn’t doubt 10-20.

      The rapist traitor that headed a insurrection on Jan 6 2021 has never spent a day in jail and is still the frontrunner for president to be legally elected in 2024.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        still the frontrunner for president to be legally elected in 2024.

        The front runner? Really?

        I’m not being sarcastic. Im genuinely interested, but can’t be arsed to start going through polls because it’d mean going through the biases of the pollers.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            it’s not really.that close.whem you compare it to 2016/2020

            Trump underpolls significantly,.by 5-8%, and did for both 2016 and 2020.

            Bidens hasn’t led trump in polling in 500 days

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re wrong about a lot and you’re presenting your opinions as fact. Trump doesn’t underpoll by that amount now.

              There was a phenomenon in 2016 where people were reluctant to tell pollsters they were voting for him, because they were embarrassed. Now Trump supporters are the loud minority of voters. And Biden is the boring safe choice. Biden voters are less likely to stay on the phone and answer questions.

              Also, national polls mean very little. You have to actually look at the swing state polls to find out who’s winning. And there’s not much data this far from the election.

              Finally, we can tell there’s something wrong with current polling just because “Mr. Brainworms” RFK Jr polls around 10% right now. No one is going to vote for him, and definitely not 10% of the population. People are just fucking with the pollsters right now. Do you know anyone seriously considering voting for RFK Jr?

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                You can project whatever narrative you want into the data but what is I’m saying is fundamentally the case.

                Trump outperforms his polling. He did so in 2016 by a wide margin, and he did so again in 2020. You can just go look at the week prior polling. This isn’t some grandiose fiction it’s a statement of fact, that you seem to be ignorant to.

                Your interest in a particular narrative doesn’t change what is. What matters is that Biden needs around an 8% lead on Trump nationally to be secure, and has been trailing, basically the entire time.

                If the election were tomorrow, and we believe the offsets observed in the two previous national elections, and we should because those were real events made from real data, then Biden would lose in a landslide today.

                Because I can’t stand all of your group think naivete:

                I went and pulled the 2020 data. The above is the relative error in polling from polls during the months of October and November 2020, calculated against the real votes cast in 2020. Biden underperforms his polling by about 4% and Trump overperforms his polling by about 8%. You can argue with why this is the case, but you can-not pretend that this isn’t the case. You should be adjusting how you see polls with this in mind. When you see Biden trailing Trump in national polling (and he has been for 400 days in a row), you should see that as a CLEAR Trump lead considering that Trump CONSISTENTLY overperforms on election day relative to his polling.

                Sources: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/42MVDX

                https://electionlab.mit.edu/data

                https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/data/president_polls_historical.csv

                • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You didn’t answer the question:

                  Do you know anyone who is voting for RFK Jr? He is polling at 10% right now, so if it’s real then statistically you should know someone.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      also he worked with wikileaks… i think he was named as a source posthumously…

      he also wrote an open source system of servers that function exactly like wikileaks submission system (actually i think it is, given clues as to how it operates… like the manning chat logs)
      dead drop is now called “open drop” and powers every major newspaper’s leak submission system…

      he was murdered.

      not only the did it make no sense, given the 6 month plea bargain option, but he was an outspoken activist and would’ve at least left a note… in the form of some post online…

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      He committed the idealist’s perennial sin: He thought that because the system is bullshit, it’s okay not to play ball with it.

      “Hey this is a bunch of crap. I can be guilty or innocent, and the right move is always to plead guilty even if I didn’t do a damn thing wrong, because if I try to fight the case they’re gonna tack on a ton of new charges and they almost always win and I might go away for most of my life.”

      “Preach.”

      “I’m gonna plead not guilty because I didn’t do anything wrong.”

      “No no no no no that is not the way to reform the system no no no that is a bad mistake”

      Aaron Swartz was a fuckin hero. Read his posthumous book, it is wonderful. But the same idealism and faith that led him to the good things he did in his painfully short time here, also led him not to understand how to engage with the US federal government and keep your skin.

  • Bruhh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    If I remember correctly, it wasn’t even illegal since these scientific articles should have been public to begin with because they used public funds.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Frankly, I don’t think that was enough to make Aaron commit suicide. However, having close relations like Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian completely turn sour and blame him probably did, and I’m akin to believe they know what they did given how hard they doubled down on “well, Aaron really wasn’t that great of a guy” narrative.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Law Enforcement and the Justice System have every responsibility to enforce laws as they were written, JSTOR pressed charges and the US Government offered Auron a plea deal to reduce his sentence to 6 months.

      Definitely an argument about the inadequacy of US Healthcare to be made here, though. Auron clearly could have used some counseling.

      • vfye@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Only prosecuting district attorneys can chose to bring a crimial charge to court.*

        *except in north carolina… for some reason they actually let victims prosecute.

      • zik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I thought there was a prosecutor who pursued this beyond all reasonable bounds, making Aaron’s life a living hell and driving him to suicide?

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Well if a Psychologist had helped him through it maybe he could have turned around and sued that prosecutor into disbarment.

          EDIT: People are downvoting this, but TBH I wouldn’t kill myself over a 35 year sentence much less the 6 months in the plea deal this guy got. Wouldn’t consider it for a single moment. He had agency in his own actions.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Spilled milk, but yeah that dude was a shill and should probably be dealt with if they haven’t already.

              • jagungal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                The prosecutor went on to have a pretty successful career and I think had a role in Obama’s administration. She basically said “I’m sorry your son killed himself” but never admitted to having a part in his death.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s not exactly what happened.

    Aaron committed suicide before his case went to trial, and so he was never convicted let alone sentenced. 35 years was never even likely; had it gone to trial there’s every reason to think he’d have been acquitted outright, or at worst given a slap on the wrist. Not that he should have even been charged, of course.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Oil CEOs pay fines for bringing about a global climate catastrophe. Fascist politicians are given slaps on the wrist for an attempted coup d’etat. Government officials openly commit gross violations of privacy and suffer no consequences.

    But a guy hacks a university network and downloads a hoard of scientific articles that should have been freely accessible to begin with and he gets 35 years in prison. I’ll admit I wasn’t familiar with this case before I saw this picture. Which is kind of insane in and of itself.

    • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Remember Kim Dotcom? He had a file sharing website and the police raided his house with guns like he was a dangerous criminal. There is a video of it on YouTube.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly I had forgotten about the whole MegaUpload stuff.

        Given, Kim Dotcom had a long history of being a trash person before the MegaUpload raid; Trading in stolen credit card info, embezzlement, black-hat hacking, etc… But he definitely didn’t deserve to get swatted just because he hosted a site that was popular with media pirates. The police used his prior convictions as justification for their heavy-handed tactics. But the reality is that they likely would have gone in with SWAT even if he had a squeaky clean record beforehand.

  • Hubi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    He didn’t even share them as far as I know, he just downloaded them. And the trial hadn’t started yet when he committed suicide.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      He didn’t get the chance to share them because he was caught downloading them, and his download requests were getting blocked.

      And to be clear, he wasn’t downloading from the Internet as one might download a car, he went into a restricted networking closet and connected directly to the switch, leaving a computer sitting there sending access requests. He had to keep going back to it to check on the progress, which is when they caught him.

      And the trial hadn’t started yet when he committed suicide.

      Yeah, I agree with the sentiment of the post, but this is just wildly misleading. He was not sentenced to anything, he committed suicide before the trial.

      He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected, in an effort to make the feds justify the ludicrous charges they were pressing. Had it gone to trial, he certainly wouldn’t have been found not guilty, but it’s unlikely many of those charges would have stuck. It’s extremely unlikely he would actually have served 35 years.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I didn’t object to anything, if anything, I declared/observed.

                Lemmy will suffer the same issues as reddit regarding content, modding, quality, etc. Just not yet

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s the federation part

          If there was no interaction across instances then their respective populations would be smaller and thus the experience would be better

          • Fontasia@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not a bug, a feature. Bubbles are not healthy, if you can see the horrible, the horrible can see you. You are reminded that there’s dangerous viewpoints out there, they are reminded that they will have to debate and argue logically to be tolerated. That is one of the few ways to cure a toxic point of view. Doesn’t work everytime obviously, but if you get one person to hesitate before posting some sort of BS comment we’re 90% of the way there.

            I’m talking from a Netherlands server, you from Canada. I’m sure lots of differences of opinion but I know you’re a person with experiences different from mine and therefore I need to be respectful when discussing things I don’t know anything about.

  • koavf@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Please don’t spread misinformation.

    Edit: Why is anyone downvoting this? The text is inaccurate and should not be posted.

      • koavf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It is not true that he was sentenced to 35 years in prison by US authorities for transferring and sharing scientific articles from JSTOR. It is true that he killed himself.

            • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Looks likely he would have been convicted, especially considering the whole suicide thing??

              Basically the same thing, calling it misinformation implies its creating a perception of the incident that is unwarranted, where I would disagree that the distinction has any merit

              • koavf@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I am genuinely disappointed that on an ostensibly science-related message board I see comments along the lines “this isn’t actually true, but it kinda-sorta is, therefore, inaccurate claims somehow aren’t misinformation”. If all kinds of counter-factual things were true, then all kinds of things would be true: what is the point of this hand-waving to defend something that is riddled with untruths? Also, with whom did he purportedly share these documents? In 22 words, this person got no fewer than two things wrong and you are carrying water for what reason?

                • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Law is not science, it’s politics. This is a political distinction, not a matter of the laws of reality

                  Their comment wasn’t a dissertation, i didn’t expect extreme precision, I’m defending the spirit in which I believe that comment was posted, because I agree with it, simple as

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Rocking up to a popular conversation, and saying this is wrong, but not providing what you consider correct. Is a great way to not be a contributing member of society.

      Requiring people to have a 15 message subthread to figure out what you meant from your first comment is very unhelpful

      • koavf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I thought it was pretty obvious, since there is so little actual content in the post, but I guess you’re right. Thanks.

    • irreticent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can’t make a claim like that without elaborating why you think it’s misinormation [SIC].

        • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          According to a quick read on Wikipedia, you are right. He was charged, But not sentenced.

          On January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) police on state breaking-and-entering charges, after connecting a computer to the MIT network in an unmarked and unlocked closet and setting it to download academic journal articles systematically from JSTOR using a guest user account issued to him by MIT.[15][16] Federal prosecutors, led by Carmen Ortiz, later charged him with two counts of wire fraud and eleven violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,[17] carrying a cumulative maximum penalty of $1 million in fines, 35 years in prison, asset forfeiture, restitution, and supervised release.[18] Swartz declined a plea bargain under which he would have served six months in federal prison.[19] Two days after the prosecution rejected a counter-offer by Swartz, he was found dead in his Brooklyn apartment.[20][21]

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz