• lars@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If tradlife were so awesome there wouldn’t be so many painfully aggressive instasmiles in the pics.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Idk if it were a fetish, I’d be seriously into it… Sort of. Denying your wife an epidural? You are no longer in a dom/sub relationship because you just broke consent. You force your wife to become pregnant before she’s ready? That’s rape. Dictating that she does all the chores, child rearing, dinner, family shit while you just make money? That’s lazy and greedy.

      Like all these types are living in the country, super model attractive, clearly pandering to conservatives. Like shit, the idea of having 6 kids? I think that’s fun, especially if they are spaced just a bit apart, and plenty of living space. Sure, you get to spend less time with each kid individually, but then you get to watch each one turn into their own person, and hopefully you’ve given them enough energy that they will live a good life later.

      It’s a fantasy pandering to conservatives that it can be “real.” Since they are influencers? It’s automatically not real.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, numbers are power, and if you are not a fan of power, then kids are treasure and happiness and joy.

        But! People working their ass out to grow 6 kids (I’m not even talking about money, just about watching them not to kill themselves) won’t look like this. It won’t be easy. It won’t be glossy.

        And, of course, in a normal traditional family the husband would be just as overloaded. Weekends, bitch? Nah, go fix every shit that broke, especially things that your wife needs to do her part.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        What’s wrong with that? They do the same thing with their cows to get their raw milk going. She’s just another cow to him.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is, free use is a thing this is just free use with bullshit rules made a couple thousand years ago by a cult of incel dudes.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Of course it’s a fetish. I too have a fetish of living somewhere wet, green, with trees and stones around and stone+wood construction, with a bit of the traditional lifestyle in that general area. I mean, without the bad parts (sign language there is called “bride’s language” cause a bride wasn’t supposed to utter a word 3 months after marriage in olden days).

      The fetish is about woods, mountains, silence and freedom.

      The problem with these people is that they are trying to show some “perfect” life, the way everybody expects “perfect” (in their own opinion) workflow in computer stuff, “perfect” bodies in porn, “perfect” politicians (cancel culture is bad not cause rape\racism\theft is good, it’s bad because figures carefully prepared to not even raise suspicions come on top, and these are usually not the most moral ones, just those with better advisors), “perfect” partners (you know these people who do lots of clubbing and dating and all even speak in the same voices in similar situations ; you divert from their ritual, they go anxious ; you say “ADHD”, they say other people don’t need to know that ; you have a hiding-from-society day when they want to go out, they feel badly hurt), “perfect” communication (one my friend has read somewhere that he has personal borders, but somehow missed that others have them too and saying “fuck off” to him is not violating his, while threatening to punch that other person is a violation), and so on.

      OK, wrote too much. I just hate that glossy shit around us.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, it’s always about sex too. Women don’t just spawn children from nothing, after all.

        It’s like findom combined with a breeding and submissive fetish.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    What was the thing that was shared a couple days ago?

    Nature wants 5/7 of your kids to make it and for you to die at 50 or something…

    So people who want to live a traditional life are ok with that or they still want the benefits of society while not participating in it?

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nature wants 5/7 of your kids to make it and for you to die at 50 or something…

      Lol that’s low-key overly optimistic

      • Kanda@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        50? The human body expires by 25 and there’s no teeth left, also they should already be dead because of child mortality

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Our lifespans are 60-70 years and have been even in those times.

          Child mortality just lowered the average to around 30. A lot of babies died, but if you managed to get to your teens, it wouldn’t be unreasonable by any standard to assume you’ll get to 60-70.

          Our “three score and ten”.

          “There’s no teeth left”?

          I mean unless they smoked a lot of crack or meth back then, idk where the teeth would’ve gone. Sure they had worse healthcare but probably also a healthier diet for their teeth.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      In typical USA society, precarious access to healthcare due to exorbitant prices certainly helps keep the average population age down.

  • Aganim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Having kids and drinking milk all day sounds like my idea of hell, actually. I’m terrible with kids and my lactose intolerant bowels are protesting in advance…

  • BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Being forced to drink raw milk all day is part of an ancient execution method designed to kill you with your own diarrhea soaking you until you rot alive.

    • weremacaque@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately, this is true but they’ll also mix it with honey and pour it on you as well. Bugs and rats will then start to eat you alive along with the bacteria. It’s called Scaphism.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The veracity of that is a bit debatable though, it’s allegedly a Persian practice and the only sources are Greek wartime propaganda intended to paint them as barbarians.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s so good about raw milk, I’ve seen Yanks mention it a bunch of times

    • aiden@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      3 months ago

      They thinks it’s better for you or something because it’s not processed. It’s actually worse, can make you really sick if you get unlucky

      • Cosmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 months ago

        ah yes. just the way God intended; we should be drinking raw, non-processed… cow milk.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Just inject the all natural, organic, unprocessed, 100% chemical free, snake venom into my veins.

          It’s what sweet little baby jeebus would have wanted.

      • IonAddis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s actually worse, can make you really sick if you get unlucky

        The part that gets me is this…

        You can get salmonella from unpasteurized milk. This happens a lot…especially considering America pasteurizes the majority of its milk…but when you hear of a milk-related outbreak a lot of the time it’s from unpasteurized milk even though percent wise it’s a small portion of our milk supply.

        Anyway. A healthy adult might get through salmonella ok. BUT. Salmonella can completely fuck up a 3 year old’s kidneys FOR LIFE. And it can be just as bad for the elderly.

        These are both groups that have other people providing their food. If a 3 year old or child is given milk by mom and dad…well, they drink it. They have no choice in whether it’s pasteurized or not. That’s why government regulation of milk steps in, to make sure dumb people having babies don’t harm their kids through their poor choices.

        Giving unpasteurized milk to kids is similar to anti-vaxxers not vaccinating their kids. Basically, the parent involved has gone haywire over any smaller/imagined detriment or benefit, and chooses the action that could bring the MOST harm while thinking they are taking the route of least harm.

        With raw milk, parents think the “nutrients” are better or something (even though…you know…we cook most of our food so MOST of our food is heat treated), and the food poisoning from possible salmonella minor/non-existent, when reality the nutrient profile isn’t much different between pasteurized/unpasteurized milk, but the salmonella can kill the vulnerable or cripple their organs for life.

        It all comes down to people being alive now in an era where we no longer have elders/grandparents telling others about how people used to DIE from these things.

        People hear about getting cancer or dementia or whatever all the time, but haven’t actually seen the old-school childhood illnesses from tainted milk or viruses or the like, so people make the wrong choice because it’s not apparent from their own life experience how bad those illnesses were since they don’t have family that talks about people they knew who got sick and died. The science is too abstract for them to internalize, but “choosing your own food” feels good and feels like you’re in control…so people go down that route instead because they haven’t seen the consequences of salmonella in their own family or in their friends (because there’s a lot of barriers in places, including pasteurization of milk, to try to stop/prevent outbreaks.)

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some people get crazy about it.
      The US in general had some way worse listeria outbreaks than Europe did in the window where pasteurization laws were first becoming things anyone was considering, so we start from a much more “your milk will be made safe” place.

      As a result, raw milk, while still uncommon, can be sold in stores or other “normal” retail settings in most of Europe, and it’s probably what will be used for cheese manufacturing.
      In the US, it’s only available via stores that sell it exclusively via club membership, and you might get raided by the USDA if they suspect you’re trying to skirt the rules about membership. (Some stores have done hourly membership that comes with a free gallon of milk). Milk must also be pasteurized before being used for cheese, which creates a market for black market cheeses that can’t be made with pasteurized milk but aren’t cost effective to import past the various taxes we put on luxury cheese.

      As a result most Americans are either far more wary of raw milk, because our laws were written before modern milking practices reduced sanitary concerns to what we accept for meat, or they develop a persecution complex and ascribe it quasi-magical powers, ironically often getting it from places that don’t follow the sanitary practices that render it likely benign.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The thing to keep in mind when you compare the saga of turn of the century milk production between Europe and the US/Canada is the immigrant population. There just wasn’t a market for milk in the urban setting in Europe because everyone knew it was deadly since the Roman times.

        Compare that to New York, where they had a large influx of immigrants from small farming communities where children would often drink milk when young and they would buy milk that was sold out of unrefrigerated wagons coming from cows kept in confined spaces within the city. It was murderous, with tens of thousands of children’s deaths in New York City alone. Of course this was the age of Cholera so the lives of people in cities came cheap.

        The plain truth was adding formalin, which has no safe dose itself, was safer than drinking that shit the way they were selling it. North American cities quickly banned unpasteurized milk once the causal relationship was proven (despite the milkmen complaining).

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s really good if you want to catch an infection. My father in law had cows, would always boil the milk before consuming it because he didn’t want to get sick.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s what you want for cheese and butter making. Other than that, it’s probably a reason there was a fair bit of kids that died before pasteurization.

      When I was a kid, we still had milk cows so I probably dodged a bullet, and it wasn’t that my parents were some back-to-the-earth whackos, it was just Canadian rural life in the 70s. I do remember milk tasting better then though.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I grew up milking cows and drinking raw milk as well. The reason we didn’t get sick was because of the basic quality control we did as routine. In order for the pathogens to cause illness it needs three things: innoculum, time to grow and the right temperature to grow at.

        The milk was immediately put into the fridge when we brought it in. It stayed in the fridge until it was used.

        When you have 1-2 gallons coming into the house every day, you use a lot of milk and use it constantly. You don’t put a gallon in the fridge and drink over 2-3 weeks. You have to consume, process or dump it because the fridge only holds so much and you only have so many jugs. We made butter and cheese every week at least. No gallon lasted in the fridge more than 5-6 days. Usually it was used in 2-3 days.

        We knew the cow well. When she was sick or had an infection, we dumped the milk. We had to give ours antibiotics for mastitis a few times. We dumped the milk until the antibiotic was out of her system as well.

        Any jug that smelled off was dumped. It wasn’t a big deal since we had another gallon coming in a few hours.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yah, you always milked off the first bit on the ground or to the cats. We sold a little bit to the dairy so we didn’t end up wasting a lot, and everything went to the fridge quickly. On the other hand, I loved milk and on a hot day I’ve drank the better part of a gallon by myself so there wasn’t much chance of it laying around. I did stop doing that when I realized how god-awful many calories whole milk has in it.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think Americans discover their new age esoteric “all natural” phase at the moment.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      From what I can get from a quick google normal homogenized milk can lead to health problems (but don’t get scared its not poison). Instead it’s better to drink organic milk that’s not homogenized.

      And I would say let the farmers drink raw milk, they know the health of their cows best.

      Edit: Of course milk should be pasteurised, it’s the homogenisation that should be avoided. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogenization_(chemistry)

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Do you mean pasteurized? Homogenized just means that the milk is mixed so there isn’t a fat layer.

        Also it can be pasteurized and still organic. So I am suspicious of your understanding here.

        • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          He already said he “only did a quick google” so it’s fair to say there is no understanding. Love the vague “health problems” as the reason to avoid safe milk too lol.

          • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Pasteurized organic milk is safe.

            I did not write that you should drink raw milk.

            • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think the issue is that you felt the need to write anything at all. You admittedly know nothing about it and just gave confusing information based on a cursory internet search.

                • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I think we’d be happy with “remotely relevant” or even “well researched”. I’m not sure what you were going for.

            • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ok well you replied to a comment asking the benefits of raw milk, in a thread about raw milk. Your off topic comment is therefore misleading.

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          This has nothing to do with anything, but I know what homogenized means in the context of milk, but when I was a kid, I used to think it meant milk from different cows had been mixed. Like, that’s why the called it homogenized. That they were, for some reason, mandated to make giant vats of cow-juice from millions of cows, and stir it together before they could sell it.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Of course milk should be pasteurised, it’s the homogenisation that should be avoided.

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            So what is the problem with homogenization? You like big fat globs instead of small ones? You want fat to separate out for better health? It’s just a mechanical treatment.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      3 months ago

      It can be healthier, if it doesn’t make you sick. You gotta be used to it though

      • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        So, yes but actually no and it should be avoided for the reasons we have regulations about the sale of milk?

  • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    All I can see is that table outside covered with food and think about the HOURS of work that went into that. No thanks!

  • bazus1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    kitchen table chairs outdoors in the grass is a recipe for a broken chair and a crying kid.

  • Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Funny if true, but if true possibly also a HIPAA violation. Wouldnt want the doctor to get in trouble, should probably skip any o’ them city folk inventions for the next 8 kids just to be safe.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Oof. Please don’t make jokes that villainize HIPAA. We have few enough privacy laws, as it is.

      HIPAA, applied properly, means her husband shouldn’t have learned the details of her selected care, without her consent.

      Edit: You were saying the same thing. I misunderstood.

      • Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        What part of what i said villainized HIPAA?

        Even if what you said is true, he just has to see the tweet for it to be a violation.

        Data disclosure without authorization of the patient is a violation, and that doesn’t matter who its disclosed to.

        Source I work in medtech, i do yearly trainings on handling patient data, and its unlikely im related to any of them 😅

        Edit: to clarify… we are arguing about the doctor disclosing to the internet that this woman got an epidural, and whether or not that is a potential HIPAA violation right?

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          we are arguing about the doctor disclosing to the internet that this woman got an epidural, and whether or not that is a potential HIPAA violation right?

          I missed that you meant if her doctor disclosed this. You’re right. That’s a wild HIPAA violation.