• GarboDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The newest design is just… not good??? Looks like a pug and a Shiba mix breed than yk… a fox

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Its actually a sign of domestication, Fox muzzle length along with raccoons are decreasing everywhere as they interact more with humans.

  • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Old-school Star Fox had the best model, but the graphics in the middle photo are hands down the best of the three.

    I remember thinking in the early 2000s that more polygons = better graphics, but that absolutely began changing when gaming went into the Xbox One / PS4 era. Especially now, I just want games that are well optimized and allow for more settings customization.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The ability to render more polygons creates more opportunity for different graphics, but you’re right, it isn’t better. The issue is that the “premium” style is realism. All AAA games now think they need to recreate reality. Style is what they should be aiming towards. We want something that looks cool, not necessarily real.

      How many people say their favorite painting style is realism? Probably not very many. Why do we limit video games to that then? (I haven’t played a AAA for a while now, partially because of this, and partially because their gameplay is all boring and generic.)

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I remember thinking in the early 2000s that more polygons = better graphics

      Well, back in the day, games were really held back by their lack of polygons, and a game with more polygons could look significantly better.

      In these days, though, we have enough polygons to make things look fantastic, so now it comes down to artistic skill, effort, and taste.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Every few years I think “this is true photorealism; we can’t go further”. And every few years they introduce some new technology that upheaves everything and requires a new generation of graphic engines and tech to properly show off.

      Though maybe it’s just my eyesight getting worse, but I think the first Star Wars: Battlefront reboot was close enough to reality that they could have stopped there. That or the FOX Engine - the tech demos from before Konami killed it would show a real video side-by-side with a render and they were nearly indistinguishable. (Edit: might have been this one?)

      Skin and facial animations are what’s really holding us back. Forget yet another lighting revolution, focus on the basics!

      • YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Eventually we’ll get to uncanny valley and have to pull back into stylistic styles instead of photo realism because it will give everyone the creeps.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          16 hours ago

          We have been there for decades. Quite famously Princess Fiona in Shrek over 20 years ago had to be stylized because her original model was too uncanny valley.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          We’re mostly past that though. There was a period that made people feel strange, but modern games the characters are close enough that we can empathize with them, and we don’t think there’s something wrong. There’s still some improvements to make, especially with how light interacts with skin, but it’s close.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    God, it makes the new models look so much worse when you put them next to the old ones like that.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The new one looks like Fox just keeps reprising his role in the new reboot of the movie that keeps coming out, and now he’s older but they figured they’d just lean into it instead of trying to de-age him.

        Did he look like that in the Galaxy movie??

    • Velypso@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It also makes the new models looks worse when you crush the colors so bad you cant tell the difference between his nose and the walls.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You know… At first, I was sad that there might be a new Star Fox game without Krystal in it.

    But with models like this, I’m kind of glad Krystal isn’t in it. I’d hate to see her done dirty like that.

  • imahappyguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Two things, one it’s a different angle. Two, they straight up removed the nose lol. Also, this is Fox’s dad.