• ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    THERE’S LIKE ZERO HINTS ON WHAT MOVIE THESE REVIEWS ARE OF YET EVERYONE HERE INHERENTLY KNOWS WHAT MOVIE IT IS AND I’M JUST SITTING HERE OBLIVIOUS OH GOD

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 days ago

    I made it 10min, once he started “hacking” teamvewer with a generated master password I GTFO. They tried real hard to make it realistic by having real software and apps but it’s bad, really bad.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think it’s the same production company that made Searching and Missing. Those movies are good.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      This stuff is still crazy to me. Every movie these days seems to cost at least 100 million dollars, because every movie that doesn’t make billions is a failure. But they can’t get something like a guy working a computer right… Ever. Or plumbing, it’s always a guy turning A random valve or tighten some bolt with the wrong tool. Everyone playing a video game in a movie is just hitting all the buttons. It’s eventually not what makes or breaks a movie, but it’s so annoying

      • SSTF@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        What’s weird about video games is there isn’t a library of stock prop games. It doesn’t take a ton of time to make something in a free engine. I’m sure studio VFX departments have people who could whip up a few demo sized “games” that can actually be controlled and played but don’t have failure states so actors can actually “play” them while filming without having to be too distracted from the scene itself. It would also ensure no rights issues come up with game studios about showing the footage.

        Instead we get actors often overenthusiastically wiggling controllers around and insert footage of games that don’t match the motions at all.

        • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sometimes they don’t even show the game and people are still going nuts on the controller. Put on smany game and let them play while they act. It makes the conversation look way more natural, because they still have to look at the screen while talking, like you would irl.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Even having the characters drive a car is pretty hit or miss, so anything more complex is predictably, right out.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    Matthew M doesn’t realize that a half star is actually an emotional response and if it took him 15 minutes to write something, that movie had him THINKING. Thats what Art should do. Art can be something you HATE. That is an emotion. Art is suppost to make you feel something, and feeling something at the extream makes it pretty fucking good Art.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      feeling something at the extream makes it pretty fucking good Art.

      Uh, no. A good movie should make you feel something at least close to an intended emotion set, or at least get you thinking about its content.

      I’m gonna venture a guess that nobody intended for the reaction to the movie to be someone having trouble thinking about how to write a 0.5 star review for it and then quit and tell other people not to waste their time.

      The people watching yet another rehash of war of the worlds are not going to be (for the most part) art snobs. When the audience that would bother watching this watch it and say it sucks, I fucking believe them.

      I haven’t wasted my time because I heed warnings rather than touching hot stoves.

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      By this definition, performing a genocide is art.

      Edit: I have been informed by replies, thank you.

      By this definition, performing a genocide can be art.

      Also, this post was art because I pissed off a bunch of people to the point that they were compelled to respond.

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        The Pitch Meeting video is how I first learned this movie exists. Sent it to a friend with the message:

        I haven’t watched the pitch meeting yet but there is no chance in hell this movie is better than the original

        Secretly I was hoping I was wrong, but oh boy, that turned out to be an understatement. Turns out my friend had actually already watched it with his mother… Or rather, tried to watch it. They had to stop hallway through because of how shit it was.

        So glad I didn’t have to experience that.

        (Note: I have since learned that the movie I was thinking about is not the original, there was an older movie and they’re both based on a book)

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I watched the Pitch Meeting because of this comment. I’m tempted to watch it. I loved hate watching Madam Web with friends. Would this be fun too?

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    The setup of this movie reminds me of Locke with Tom Hardy. That’s also basically a movie where you watch 1 person in a static situation (in a car in Locke) conducting remote project management. I’d have never expected a full movie to work with that setup, but Locke pulls it off imo.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      There was a whole movie with a guy in a box hoping to be unearthed (Buried, or something like that). It was quite decent.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I remember watching Fail Safe by chance and that movie was so fucking tense! Completely carried by the amazing cast. Maybe I should watch it again!

      It’s about a cold war situation where iirc the USA bomb a city in Russia by accident and the movie / play is about how the two presidents negotiate to avoid all out nuclear war. Fantastic stuff.

  • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    My first fucking thought was was “yeah, how about no, I’m in fucking zoom calls all fucking day at work.” I give them credit, interesting idea as a high concept thing, but like no chance I’m even giving this 10 minutes even if the reviews weren’t utter shit.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    I hate the fact that this movie causes people to make fun of the genre and think it’s bad in general. Searching is an amazing movie and I love it, and it also has its entire plot on a computer screen. But it actually works, if you have a skilled director, great actors, a really good plot, and know how to exactly use that concept to make a great movie.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    Citizen Kane has nothing on Ice cube yelling “got em!” At a computer screen.

    Also you can see the green screen reflected on his glasses the whole time